This is the truth. But the Dems know that and don't care. The more mass shootings, the more they get to push their agenda.Politicizing Mass Shootings Only Guarantees There Will Be More of Them | Mises Institute
Mass shootings are bad enough, but progressives have turned them into political events. They then claim that further politicizing these tragedies will reducemises.org
It is unfortunate this is not discussed more.
Gun Control Paradox.
The more they talk about banning guns, the more guns are sold.
I've said it before.
If the anti gunners had kept their mouths shut for the last few decades, there would be LESS guns out there.
THEY are actually responsible for MORE guns being out there.
Gun Control Paradox.
The more they talk about banning guns, the more guns are sold.
I've said it before.
If the anti gunners had kept their mouths shut for the last few decades, there would be LESS guns out there.
THEY are actually responsible for MORE guns being out there.
Refresh my memory please, what States again have banned certain firearms and made the owners felons?This is the truth. But the Dems know that and don't care. The more mass shootings, the more they get to push their agenda.
I am actually quite concerned that they may be able to succeed this time in banning most rifles. They won't need to go "door to door" to confiscate them; because they will instantly make all lawful gun owners who don't "turn them in" felons. And then take them one by one over a long time period as they ruin our lives and destroy our freedom. It's the same way they have done it in the left-wing states, but this time, it will be federally.
Every one of us here needs to be contacting our (and all other) legislators immediately and frequently. We cannot sit by and "let a ban happen". Only a mass outpouring of loud opposition to this scheme will prevent it. (And not just "preaching to the choir" here.)
CT, NJ, NY, CA, MA, usual suspectsRefresh my memory please, what States again have banned certain firearms and made the owners felons?
Interesting, im from Md and they have 82+ - banned firearms.CT, NJ, NY, CA, MA, usual suspects
I believe that statement incorrect, “most of which are suicide“ I believe is correct…Guns (Most of which are firearms accidents) are 39,312.
Interesting, im from Md and they have 82+ - banned firearms.
If one owned them before the ban, not a problem.
If one that owns banned firearms dies, they can be left to other MD residents without a problem.
I just dont recall any States making owners felons.
FIFYAnd it's the same people whoallowedcaused this. Their MO hasn't changed much
View attachment 204295
The same government that cannot identify what a woman is going to identify what an "assault weapon" is? They are using verbs as adjectives? They can tell us that bees are fish but even my two year old knows that they are wrong.Been seeing lots of push for it
The document that listed that, didn't list how the suicides were committed.I believe that statement incorrect, “most of which are suicide“ I believe is correct…
I just know that for years the anti’s “gun deaths” totals usually included suicide to boost the number. From my head it was like 9000 criminal type (mostly gang related), a few hundred accidents, and near 20,000 suicides to get to the 30,000 number…The document that listed that, didn't list how the suicides were committed.
Not to get grizzly... but there are a number of ways that can occur, but guns seem a top choice.
Suicide methods - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
a couple of examples - felony for daring to own a banned firearm (which was perfectly legal before the ban):Refresh my memory please, what States again have banned certain firearms and made the owners felons?
The same government that cannot identify what a woman is going to identify what an "assault weapon" is? They are using verbs as adjectives? They can tell us that bees are fish but even my two year old knows that they are wrong.