Except that the little drunk guy is waving a pistol around and threatening to kill everybody.
If we take the analogy to that point, we need to kill him now. Trump talking tough, again, is not useful.
...but analogies are only so useful.
Except that the little drunk guy is waving a pistol around and threatening to kill everybody.
If we take the analogy to that point, we need to kill him now.
...but analogies are only so useful.
If we take the analogy to that point, we need to kill him now. Trump talking tough, again, is not useful.
...but analogies are only so useful.
I guess the best that we can hope for is that he doesn't shoot anybody in the bar, and someone pops him in the alley after the bar closes.
I think you need to look a lil further into Kim. I've been researching him lately, and think he's probably FAR more rational than his father, and is more liberal version of his grandfather. An evil dictator, to be sure, but I think he's probably playing the game pretty dang well.
Is that what this is? A game?
Wow. Just effing wow.
Yes. And you do understand that if Kim Jong-Un is crazy enough to nuke us because Trump might make fun of his haircut, then we will be at war with him sooner or later anyway, do you not?
He is lashing out at China now. We are going to war against North Korea (actually, just restarting hostilities) sometime in the future, unless China does us a favor and assassinates the nutjob, replacing his regime with something a bit more stable. The status quo with North Korea cannot stand.
Believe it or not, there's a term for it, it's called Political Gamesmanship, and relies heavily on your opponent overthinking capabilities and intent.
So let me get this straight. You're willing to risk another 'Pearl Harbor', only with a nuke this time.... just so the Prez can exercise his free speech?
How many points do we lose if an American city goes up in flames because we ignored our opponent's obvious moves?
The founding fathers were willing to risk everything for free speech, among other things.
I'm not a liberal. I don't blame the short skirt for the rape. You may think differently, and that's ok.
If we take the analogy to that point, we need to kill him now. Trump talking tough, again, is not useful.
...but analogies are only so useful.
I think you need to look a lil further into Kim. I've been researching him lately, and think he's probably FAR more rational than his father, and is more liberal version of his grandfather. An evil dictator, to be sure, but I think he's probably playing the game pretty dang well.
Dig them up, explain the situation, and let's see if they still think the head of state, purposefully goading an enemy is sound logic.
The term "pedophile" sure doesn't mean much anymore.
Did you vote for Clinton?
Yeah, that was a pretty sizeable chunk of the point.
I was shocked when I found out 1970's rock stars liked younger women...
I guess now you're going to tell me Jerry Lee Lewis married his 13 year old cousin...Wait..Never mind....
I like Trump....
I come to this thread to find out how gullible I am and how poorly my wife and I make financial decisions...
...well, you do sort of run a no membership fees clubhouse/museum and pretend it's a gun store...stores usually sell things vs show you cool things you're not actually allowed to buy. Speaking of which, probably see you next Tuesday.
Yea well, I can see your avatar says it all.
I expect you'll be fine if a President Trump's rhetoric pulls us into a nuclear war, as well?
North Korea can put nuclear warhead on mid-range missile - South