Nope. Your response is your response, and I'll leave it alone.
We'll start with an easy one. Registering Muslims.
Trump advocated registering (at a minimum) all Muslims until we figure out what motivates terrorism from Islamic countries. He has expressed support for the internment of Japanese during WWII. Since at least 1878, SCOTUS has said that religious opinion and belief should not be regulated - although actions can be. So, human sacrifice (or polygamy) would not be tolerated as religious expression.
But, Trump's policy would create government intervention into a person's religious belief based solely on the modern need to fight terrorism.
To you, is that an example of asserting the 1st Amendment might be open to modernization/interpretation other than through the amendment process?
Closest I could find to pins and needles.