To be fair, I can find an angle and timing of a model and make it look as ugly as any of these.
What the **** does any of that prove? Hot or ugly doesn't make one side's politial arguments more sound than another. There are hot liberals and ugly conservatives, and visa versa.
Thanks for proving my point.
Megyn Kelly is a bimbo - i.e. foolish, stupid, inept; an attractive but unintelligent woman - in the realm of political journalism.
Or, perhaps other realms, too. She actually believes that Jesus was a white man.
[video=youtube;DBn2wIQWoB8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBn2wIQWoB8[/video]
Why do you think? If he meant it how you say, why wouldn't he?Otherwise why not just stop at the eyes comment, why add on the where ever part?
You're telling me you can make Ivanka Trump look as ugly as Feinstein?
I don't see it. All I can see is Jackie Gleason. Or is that it?Steganography - its embedded in the liberal women poster posted above. If you focus on Sotomayor, then squint your eyes, and defocus until its blurry, keep looking for about 5 minutes, you can see it clear as day.
You're welcome.
There is a very good chance Jesus was Caucasian. Of which white is an acceptable term for it isn't it? Same as Black is an acceptable term for Negroid? .
Lol, "white," has always been a subjective and ever evolving word (in America).Heck there was a time when the Irish and Italians weren't considered "white." By your understanding, Mexicans, generally, are considered white. But let's not be coy. We have a pretty good inclination that Kelly meant "white" in the classic sense. In my own church, there is mural that depicts Jesus as blonde haired, and blue eyed. That's a pretty solid testament to how widespread the idea of a "white" Jesus is.
I personally, now, don't care. I have no need to claim the Messiah as one of my own. He exists for everybody, regardless of color.
Lol, "white," has always been a subjective and ever evolving word (in America).Heck there was a time when the Irish and Italians weren't considered "white." By your understanding, Mexicans, generally, are considered white. But let's not be coy. We have a pretty good inclination that Kelly meant "white" in the classic sense. In my own church, there is mural that depicts Jesus as blonde haired, and blue eyed. That's a pretty solid testament to how widespread the idea of a "white" Jesus is.
I personally, now, don't care. I have no need to claim the Messiah as one of my own. He exists for everybody, regardless of color.
I like your comment, He exists for everybody, regardless of color.
And I bet most pictures of Jesus are a handsome long haired man also. Jesus was indeed born a Jew, grew tall and wise…what skin shade not sure I could say…..long hair….funny because back then Apostle Paul who had seen Jesus also commented that if a man have long hair it is a shame to him. Long hair for the Jewish costum was hair past the shoulder by my studies anyway. Now for handsome Jesus….just some trivia for any interested and thought you might be……what did Jesus really look like…when God himself came to earth and manifested himself in the flesh for the world to see…..
Isaiah 53:2King James Version (KJV)
2 For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him.
There are too many Trump threads from which to chose to post this. I guess this thread is good as any for this.
I was thinking this morning about how vitriolic usual INGO allies have become towards each other. Hell, we have two members with creepily similar avatars, acting as the quintessential representation of this sort of war. People have take sides and on the furthest extremes of the sides, both indiscriminately support or condemn Trump.
This morning I accidentally tapped a video link mistaking it for one that I haven't seen before. But watching it again after thinking about the folly of the ridiculous conversations we've all had. I realized that this video says most everything I was thinking this morning.
Even if you've seen it, watch a gain and consider a few things.
[video=youtube;aBG6Xds7ifA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBG6Xds7ifA[/video]
Disclaimer: I do not endorse his statements about Glen Beck and other some other media ideologues on the right.
Umm...yeah. Is there a part II or something. Kept waiting for the part where he deals with whats wrong with Cruz. From the lead in he sort of gave the expectation of evenhandedness. A kinder, gentler Trump hit piece. Meh
Umm...yeah. Is there a part II or something. Kept waiting for the part where he deals with whats wrong with Cruz. From the lead in he sort of gave the expectation of evenhandedness. A kinder, gentler Trump hit piece. Meh
What the **** does any of that prove? Hot or ugly doesn't make one side's politial arguments more sound than another. There are hot liberals and ugly conservatives, and visa versa.