But a vote for Gary Johnson is a vote for Gary Johnson, who is not anti-gun.
Johnson cannot beat the anti-gun/liberal SC judge bringing candidate. Only one candidate can. Not voting for Trump is allowing the anti-gunner to win. Same result.
But a vote for Gary Johnson is a vote for Gary Johnson, who is not anti-gun.
Johnson cannot beat the anti-gun/liberal SC judge bringing candidate. Only one candidate can. Not voting for Trump is allowing the anti-gunner to win. Same result.
Is there only one anti-gun candidate? I'm taking a chance with Trump that his word is worth anything.Johnson cannot beat the anti-gun/liberal SC judge bringing candidate. Only one candidate can. Not voting for Trump is allowing the anti-gunner to win. Same result.
...I'm taking a chance with Trump that his word is worth anything.
Johnson cannot beat the anti-gun/liberal SC judge bringing candidate. Only one candidate can. Not voting for Trump is allowing the anti-gunner to win. Same result.
Yes, Johnson can beat her, hands down...
...as all the polls are showing.
Sure we are.
Not any question about Hillary though, she will do just as she says.
Yes, Johnson can beat her, hands down, if all of you Trumpers would abandon your loser and back someone with real experience who is not anti 2A. Your blind allegiance to this charlatan will ensure Hillary wins, as all the polls are showing.
"He has an advantage on me, because he can say everything he knows about any subject in 140 characters and I can’t."
Yes, Johnson can beat her, hands down, if all of you Trumpers would abandon your loser and back someone with real experience who is not anti 2A. Your blind allegiance to this charlatan will ensure Hillary wins, as all the polls are showing.
Yes, Johnson can beat her, hands down, if all of you Trumpers would abandon your loser and back someone with real experience who is not anti 2A. Your blind allegiance to this charlatan will ensure Hillary wins, as all the polls are showing.
Yes, Johnson can beat her, hands down, if all of you Trumpers would abandon your loser and back someone with real experience who is not anti 2A. Your blind allegiance to this charlatan will ensure Hillary wins, as all the polls are showing.
Because if someone regularly espouses the views and policies of a candidate, yet they claim that candidate is horrible, there's not many conclusions left to draw.
There are plenty of Muslim-majority countries that don't produce terrorism in proportion of places like Syria.
In the real world, it does.
What is the net effect of constant Trump bashing?
Yeah, and what other choice is there? Hittlery? I don't think so.........
Best to dump Trump and vote Johnson. Otherwise Hillary IS going to win. Her numbers keep going up and his are going down. A vote for Trump is a vote for Hillary.
Not quite. Not voting for Trump allows them to feel that their much vaunted, overweening principles are unsullied as they have washed their hands of any responsibility for the outcome
Muwhahahahaha. Like a moth to a flame....I like arguing with people I disagree with. There I said it. It's out now.
Actually, yes. It means, at least for me, I won't compromise what is important to join a bandwagon. That, in itself, is important to Me.
From the funny pictures thread. I don't want to carry on this conversation there.
I like arguing with people I disagree with. There I said it. It's out
Ok.Noble... But... Just remember what you are up against.
The demoncrats have no such standard. They will vote for ANYBODY with a D next to their name. The love that D.
And that is where we disagree. While I enjoy arguing with people whom I disagree with, I much prefer arguing with people I agree with, without them knowing, and taking the opposite side.. it's more intellectually stimulating and mentally satisfying.
He's just saying, noble as it is, some decisions need to be pragmatic. Tell me you've never made a decision that's more pragmatic than principled.Ok.
1) So, we're supposed to emulate that and vote for anyone with an R?
2) Still in Indiana. I haven't seen any prediction that HRC will even make it close here. If there is one, please post it.
He's just saying, noble as it is, some decisions need to be pragmatic. Tell me you've never made a decision that's more pragmatic than principled.