So what evidence do we have that says they did stop counting?
Press reports at the time. You know the whole water main break in GA that proved to be a lie…
So what evidence do we have that says they did stop counting?
I’ll try to find some tomorrow. I’m done digging through sites tonight lol. Time to wind down and laugh before tucking inI did not see it. I’m normally in bed by 9:30, which is where I’m heading now. I’ll hop on YouTube tomorrow and find some original election night coverage.
Falsely believed to be a water main, but was actually a toilet leak.Press reports at the time. You know the whole water main break in GA that proved to be a lie…
I don't think it requires the mass coordination that you think it would.So trucks and trunks were found? If that’s what you’re saying, then that’s what I’m saying about “coordination.” That wouldn’t be a series of connected events, that’s a concerted effort.
As to part B, your belief is that it was strictly about Trump? It had nothing to do with actual power and was just that short-sighted?
I've learned that anything that says "fact check" is generally nothing but spin.I know that some hate Reuters, but check this article out:
Fact Check
The article provides information that states did NOT stop counting votes. You said they did. Is there something specific in this article that’s demonstrably false? I’m asking to fact check the fact checkers.
Now, just as a thought exercise, do election 2020 and all of the bellwethers and predictive indices - just as a thought exercise, no need to admit anything or reveal the resultsExcellent! Well to answer your hypothetical, you have my word that I’ll join your legislative efforts if that scenario comes true. If the Dems sweep the midterms, I’ll be convinced there was cheating since every indicator is that won’t happen.
With official ballots printed in quantities sufficient to mail one to every voter on hopelessly inaccurate voting lists, fraudulent ballots are not necessarily necessary. Reference the cases of drug addicts caught with hundreds of ballots, evidence of piles of ballots left in apartment building lobbies, the push to legalize ballot harvesting and the waiving of identity checks on mail in ballots (such as witness signature requirements, requirement for voter's DL number on return envelope, discarding of security envelopes meant to be opened only at counting or indeed no evidence that ballots ever had those envelopes. The roster of sketchy situations just goes on and on)I’m still a little unclear, so let me ask this:
Do you think fraudulent mail-in ballots were used? If so, how were they printed, filled out, delivered, etc? This is the sort of “coordination” I’m referring to. If you don’t believe there were fraudulent ballots, then disregard.
A good place to start might be to read this, or reread it whichever appliesI truly don’t know the answer to it, and I’m trying to be honest in my posts. If that’s never happened before, then they better have a really solid reason. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
The coordination came from Mark Elias attorney at Perkins Coke Boise. He was involved in the mail in voting and associated lawsuits in every battleground state. He was all involved in the AZ investigation and GA recounts. The law firm is supported by all the democrats main supporters.Ok. My interpretation of posts over the last year has been that people believed there was a coordinated effort to steal the election. I don’t see how using pandemic scare tactics to push mail-in voting so fraud could be committed doesn’t inherently imply high-level coordination, but my belief doesn’t mean that’s what you all were implying.
Have you considered that the machine in Democrat-run large cities has been cheating for decades in order to maintain its hold on power and already has the refined skill set and the people in place. If state and federal level organizations make surplus ballots easier to counterfeit voters for as well as available in larger numbers, do you truly think you will find some smoking gun memo to the big city machines outlining the orders from the politburo?I have no information to refute this. What I’m arguing is that, if true, doesn’t that inherently mean there was specific coordination? Several in this discussion have said there wasn’t necessarily any concerted effort to steal the election. I’m saying posts like this one say otherwise.
Some places to lookI did not see it. I’m normally in bed by 9:30, which is where I’m heading now. I’ll hop on YouTube tomorrow and find some original election night coverage.
John Daniel Davidson By John Daniel Davidson
NOVEMBER 4, 2020
As of this writing, it appears that Democratic Party machines in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania are trying to steal the election.
As reporters and commentators went to bed early Tuesday morning, all three states were too close to call, but President Trump led former Vice President Joe Biden by comfortable margins—far beyond what had been predicted in the polls. None of the networks called these states because enough mail-in ballots remained uncounted that it could swing either way, but Trump’s position looked good.
Then, something strange happened in the dead of the night. In both Michigan and Wisconsin, vote dumps early Wednesday morning showed 100 percent of the votes going for Biden and zero percent—that’s zero, so not even one vote—for Trump.
In Michigan, Biden somehow got 138,339 votes and Trump got none, zero, in an overnight vote-dump.
When my Federalist colleague Sean Davis noted this, Twitter was quick to censor his tweet, even though all he had done was compare two sets of vote totals on the New York Times website. And he wasn’t the only one who noticed—although on Wednesday it appeared that anyone who noted the Biden vote dump in Michigan was getting censored by Twitter.
Many have been pointing out the evidence that we are in fact sliding into the Matrix of authoritarianism, but unfortunately too many are blinded by sophist ideals and are unable to fathom beyond what they are told by subversive media apparatchiks. Like Solzhenitsyn, many will only learn too late what many have been warning for (at this point) the better part of two years.