Not seeing a whole lot of posts from you about guns. Mostly political stuff or yelling at people to get off of your lawn. Would love to see how long it took you after joining this forum to dive into the politics subforum.Yes it does.
I am always suspicious of those that join and jump in hard on the political posts…
They would lose my vote. Plus I think they would lose the older retired vote espically among woman who don’t want a woman leader espically a president. I gather that from many talks with my mom and the woman she knows from still the great generation. If the ticket you mentioned being pro-life they will get no democrat vote. And if they are conservative they can kiss anyone democrat voting for them. Imho.I believe that a Haley/ Gabbard ticket could win a National election.
The few Democrats that have not went nuts would vote for them.
The all female ticket would bring in the suburban female vote.
If only conservatives would run moderates, they easily win and you get all the conservative wish list…They would lose my vote. Plus I think they would lose the older retired vote espically among woman who don’t want a woman leader espically a president. I gather that from many talks with my mom and the woman she knows from still the great generation. If the ticket you mentioned being pro-life they will get no democrat vote. And if they are conservative they can kiss anyone democrat voting for them. Imho.
Whose on top?I believe that a Haley/ Gabbard ticket could win a National election.
The few Democrats that have not went nuts would vote for them.
The all female ticket would bring in the suburban female vote.
Isn't that part of the rules?I try to give noobs a chance.
Can you answer my other question regardless of if it came from a noob or not. What is it that makes you suspicious of that? Plenty of others here have had that same criticism.Yes it does.
I am always suspicious of those that join and jump in hard on the political posts…
Were the points he brought up not legitimate criticisms one might have especially since this is a pro 2A "Shall Not Be Infringed" firearm-oriented forum?
At least the "suspicious" new guy's critical post was about Trump's questionable positions on firearms. It was legit criticism IMO shared by others here.Not seeing a whole lot of posts from you about guns. Mostly political stuff or yelling at people to get off of your lawn. Would love to see how long it took you after joining this forum to dive into the politics subforum.
By the way, you joined about 10 years after the forum started, so I'm thinking you need to buy a mirror, rookie.
No criticism of Trump is legitimate. You should know that by now.At least the "suspicious" new guy's critical post was about Trump's questionable positions on firearms. It was legit criticism IMO shared by others here.
See KLB gets it…No criticism of Trump is legitimate. You should know that by now.
Shshshsh…. Gonna blow my ATF cover here…Not seeing a whole lot of posts from you about guns. Mostly political stuff or yelling at people to get off of your lawn. Would love to see how long it took you after joining this forum to dive into the politics subforum.
By the way, you joined about 10 years after the forum started, so I'm thinking you need to buy a mirror, rookie.
There is a norm to how new members typically intrract in the forum as a whole and particularly the political threads and there is a way someone that already knows the players, their positions, and hot buttons posts. When someone with fewer than 10 posts jumps into the fray with both feet, and post more like an INGO vet I am suspicious…By the way, you joined about 10 years after the forum started, so I'm thinking you need to buy a mirror, rookie.
Shshshsh…. Gonna blow my ATF cover here…
While true in some circumstance, were the points he brought up not legitimate criticisms one might have especially since this is a pro 2A "Shall Not Be Infringed" firearm-oriented forum?
I might add to the post he originally posted also in which he is referring to that he forgot to add Trump's position on "Red Flag" and that is he is in favor of taking firearms first then worry about due process later.
His point was that he didn't hear any of that coming from DeSantis.
Welcome to INGO.
Should have been around sooner, we have disected your question many times before your short visit of 11 posts.
Yes it does.
I am always suspicious of those that join and jump in hard on the political posts…
Big? Nah. It has happened though.Fair enough, I disagree on it absolving someone of clearly dodging on the meat of a substantive post but to each their own. Is there really a big problem of people making accounts to troll regional gun message boards?
I was taught well by many of the members here. It was a hard lesson. I didn't bleed or cry too much.So this gives it a reason for someone to just blow it off and talk about what they want to talk about in response to his post?