O'Brian is any less socialist?Where's that little socialist fain at? Shim won't be happy about this.
O'Brian is any less socialist?Where's that little socialist fain at? Shim won't be happy about this.
Accomplishments that survived their presidency or just EO's?Please list the republican president and their accomplishments that exceed what Trump did?
2016 coattails were pretty good IIRC. Since? Republicans have been underperforming, let's say.I listed my criticisms... you picked "tweets at 3 am".... so I'll recap, for one, HUUUUGELY negative coattails.
Is there a modern Republican President with worse coattails? I don't think so.
Due diligence is the diligence that is due. Sorry for the tautology, but it seemed oddly needed. The most biased sources are bat **** crazy. They exist on both sides. A site that claims the earth is flat, for example is obviously NOT a reliable source. Would you say whatever diligence that's due for them requires more scrutiny than, say, GWP?I've got two points to make and for brevity I'll make them both here because the ideas are sort of related. Only the second is related to your post, KG
Earlier, jamil was nattering about extra due diligence needed for ideological sources. Upon careful, even jamilian consideration, I can't think of ANY sources anymore that are not ideological. Perhaps he could name the one(s) he has in mind
Then IMO, the same caveat somewhat applies to your post. We've seen that there a few, and possibly no, non-ideological courts. I would not automatically accept something as fact just because a 'court of law' in NYC or ATL said so. I believe they have adequately demonstrated that they are after a conviction and not the truth
even jamilian consideration
Neil Diamond?
Sweet Caroline...ba ba..ba..Neil Diamond?
Well, instead of analyzing what you say I said, let's look at what I actually said.I haven't gotten to use 'jamilesque' yet
Edit: In #1904 you don't answer the question (this is my shocked face). You opine that greater diligence is needed when considering ideological sites. That clearly implies that you believe there are non-ideological sites. My viewpoint is everything and everybody has an axe to grind these days, so I asked you to name sites that you consider non-ideological (and thus, one would imagine, not in need of extra scrutiny). I don't believe there are any
First, I think any ideologically based source is unreliable, whether from the left or the right. So if it's something a source like CNN or GWP reports, except when they don't have a reason to lie about it, you have to corroborate it to be confident in it.
Second, you seem to think any site that prints information unfavorable to Trump, is "left wing".
I don't see how that's in contrast with what people have said. Or do you still see yourself as oppressed by "ABT" whateverthe**** that is, who think you should vote for someone else? No one is telling you to vote for someone else.
You clearly do not read the types of publications you talk so glib about. The car mags suck and look like the government EV propaganda they are and sports mags get in to all kinds of political crap. The most revised the Rodgers/Kimmel vaccine efficacy and Epstein list. But the list of political topics covered is mind boggling. The left is everywhere…Ooh. But. And Mike. Less Mike though. Here's another one if you have any unblown mind left after that jamilgasm. Some sports magazines, rather than having a left/right bias, are biased against certain teams!Now Imma get all soap box here. Like all the contempt for the Big10 conference in football. Pfft. SEC teams can't lose to Big10 schools, because they're so beneath us. They aren't physical enough to even compete. And then UM beat Alabama. Line of scrimage> Bama was dominated. Okay, yeah, sour grapes. Fair enough.
Point is. SEC suck. No. The point is, not all biases have anything to do with left or right. It's what you care about. You care a lot about Trump, the other Trumpers, and AF and all that. That's where you're biased. But you also care about jamil. Possibly a little too much.
You clearly do not read the types of publications you talk so glib about. The car mags suck and look like the government EV propaganda they are and sports mags get in to all kinds of political crap. The most revised the Rodgers/Kimmel vaccine efficacy and Epstein list. But the list of political topics covered is mind boggling. The left is everywhere…
The leagues themselves are political. That is also waning, but it is still there. It's down enough that I was able to actually watch some games this year. TBH, the showboating by the players for making simple plays bugs me more now.Mainstream sports has gone political. ESPN is political, but that seems to have died out lately. But the next George Floyd comes along and they'll be back pontificating their racist political ****. But there are a lot of publishers who don't. Their version of politics is deflate-gate. Spy-gate. Etcetera.
OMG. Someone said something nice about EVs. They're obviously flaming progressives.
Or, they could actually be good cars for some people, especially people that like to drive fast.
Well, yeah. We had the Kaepernick ideological kneeling ********. And I will say the NFL is political as far as it affects their bottom line. Goodell doesn't give a flying **** about the culture war. He just wants to try to be on the side that wins. The winds are shifting and so is Goodell.The leagues themselves are political. That is also waning, but it is still there. It's down enough that I was able to actually watch some games this year. TBH, the showboating by the players for making simple plays bugs me more now.
Agreed. Both sides of the political mess need to butt out.I think EV's aren't capable of replacing ICE vehicles yet. Whatever market there is for it should be organically grown. Shouldn't need government subsidies to grow. Shouldn't need ideologues pushing them to be viable.
Meh. Showboating for doing your f'in job is ridiculous. More so since the networks insist on focusing on it, which just causes more of it. They should stop focusing on it.Well, yeah. We had the Kaepernick ideological kneeling ********. And I will say the NFL is political as far as it affects their bottom line. Goodell doesn't give a flying **** about the culture war. He just wants to try to be on the side that wins. The winds are shifting and so is Goodell.
Speaking of the showboating, I kinda don't give a **** about that. The only time it pisses me off really is when it costs the team I'm rooting for. Taunting, excessive celebrations, unsportsmanlike conduct, when it is on my team, it's enfuriating. When it's on the other team, of course I enjoy that.