Who would you say had the preponderance in numbers in the "academic" conflict.Yes, Turley is a seemingly knowledgeable scholar, and yes I quote him often. (Also check his blog daily.)
So since academia had obvious conflicts on this situation, shouldn’t the constitutional resolution be for the federal courts to hear this and run it up the chain to SCOTUS? And, for Gods sake stop hiding behind “standing”?
Those like Turley or those like Eastman?