Well... why else would they expect to need to use deadly force to recover some documents? Did they authorize the use of deadly force to get the documents from Biden's garage?Marjorie Taylor Greene says FBI planned to 'assassinate' Donald Trump
The FBI insists its reference to "use of deadly force" during the Mar-a-Lago raid was "standard protocol."www.newsweek.com
This is why people think Republicans are bat **** crazy.
Marjorie Taylor Greene says FBI planned to 'assassinate' Donald Trump
The FBI insists its reference to "use of deadly force" during the Mar-a-Lago raid was "standard protocol."www.newsweek.com
This is why people think Republicans are bat **** crazy.
Well... why else would they expect to need to use deadly force to recover some documents? Did they authorize the use of deadly force to get the documents from Biden's garage?
FBI was 'prepared to use deadly force' in Trump raid
A new court filing unsealed on Tuesday in the Trump classified documents case revealed federal agents were prepared to use 'deadly force' when executing a raid at Mar-a-Lago in 2022.www.dailymail.co.uk
Was this going to be a "lawful" assassination?
I think it wouldn't be necessary. Even if Trump were present when they raided, it's unthinkable that anything would come to require the use of deadly force.Why would it be necessary?
Why not the head of one department calls the head of the Secret Service?
Hey. We have a warrant.
Don't shoot.
Not “sure” but as much illegal maneuvering as the deep state has been proven to have done to get Trump and undermine his administration and campaigns makes it highly plausible…What makes you so sure it was even an assassination attempt?
Policy for a former president of the United States?I think it wouldn't be necessary. Even if Trump were present when they raided, it's unthinkable that anything would come to require the use of deadly force.
But, what happened, is the language was found by Trump's lawyers, and they're making as much use of it as they can.
I understand this link is AP news, and not very reliable when it comes to politics and sides. But, it contains quotes from the FBI and from their policies. This looks like a standard policy to me. The FBI had guns. It's probably a good idea to state under what conditions agents may use deadly force. But the policy is being spun and shopped as clickbait, making claims like they were preparing for deadly force.
FACT FOCUS: Trump distorts use of 'deadly force' language in FBI document for Mar-a-Lago search
Trump pointed to standard language used in an FBI document unsealed Tuesday to baselessly claim the Biden administration wanted to kill him during a search for documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in 2022.apnews.com
Idunno. Maybe some INGO LEO's might have some insight they can share about how common the practice is for any law enforcment agency to have such policies stated in an order to raid someone's home.
Do they even have policy that covers that? I don't know. I'm not in that world.Policy for a former president of the United States?
That should be some advanced Policy making.
Who has a Policy on using deadly force on a former president? Who thinks about using deadly force on a main contender for president?
That's what I'm thinking.Do they even have policy that covers that? I don't know. I'm not in that world.
Is it a precedent? I'm happy to believe that Democrats are capable of the most vile behavior, but I'm not inclined to trust everything right wing media claim either.That's what I'm thinking.
This is something totally out of normal.
This isn't going to an Airport executive and shooting him down at 0500.
This is a former president of the United States withsecret service protection, and he's running for president.
The democrats have set a dangerous precedent for the future of this country.
Is it a precedent?
The precedent would be weaponizing the DoJ against political opponents, to raid them in the first place. That's a pretty old trick, but not at the level of POTUS.Yes it is, and it will be used more, and more against political enemies.