Isn’t it remarkable what the judge decides is evidence in the NDA trial? A whore is allowed to testify to matters not in dispute with salacious detail on sexual positions, while an FEC chairman cannot testify as to facts that refute prosecution charges…
“Smith’s testimony could have opened the jury’s eyes to the fact that the FEC and Department of Justice deliberately chose not to charge Trump for same payment Bragg insists amounts to a felony. Yet Merchan barred him from mentioning the matter.”
“That the FEC dismissed the complaint against defendant and the DOJ decided against prosecuting defendant for potential FECA violations are probative of nothing,” Merchan wrote “These matters are therefore irrelevant and defendant is precluded from eliciting testimony or introducing evidence or both.”
“Smith’s testimony could have opened the jury’s eyes to the fact that the FEC and Department of Justice deliberately chose not to charge Trump for same payment Bragg insists amounts to a felony. Yet Merchan barred him from mentioning the matter.”
“That the FEC dismissed the complaint against defendant and the DOJ decided against prosecuting defendant for potential FECA violations are probative of nothing,” Merchan wrote “These matters are therefore irrelevant and defendant is precluded from eliciting testimony or introducing evidence or both.”
Judge Bans Fmr FEC Chairman From Sharing Facts In Trump Trial
A New York judge has strictly limited the information a key witness for Trump’s defense can testify about in court.
thefederalist.com