And it's disgusting. On brand, but disgusting.So is Trump.
And it's disgusting. On brand, but disgusting.So is Trump.
So because you have convinced yourself that only Trump is "standing up to left" you are making it clear that you will mindlessly follow him into any position or stance, from "take the guns first" to supporting CCP control of propaganda apps?I believe:
There is only one guy that ever stood up to the left, there are not any other choices, this is the pony we must ride.
So folks can nit pick all they want, I’m sure that is very helpful to our enemies…
We don't have to be allergic to winning and results...Kemp is a compromised CoC republican. Your constant references to him are just another symptom of the fever…
While there may be some not everything is simply nit picking. Tell me this, would it not be a bit eyebrow raising to you if what @SheepDog4Life posted were about DeSantis?I believe:
That another four years of what we have now will forever end the possibility of being a constitutional based country.
There is only one guy that ever stood up to the left, there are not any other choices, this is the pony we must ride.
So folks can nit pick all they want, I’m sure that is very helpful to our enemies…
The talking points for "why you don't need a bumpstock" are in an earlier chapter.So because you have convinced yourself that only Trump is "standing up to left" you are making it clear that you will mindlessly follow him into any position or stance, from "take the guns first" to supporting CCP control of propaganda apps?
View attachment 339711
I'm seeing more and more discussion in legal circles about the Molly Hemmingway "Fruit of the poisonous tree" article in the federalist that @Ingomike posted recently involving the illegally recorded Ga. phone call that appears to be the triggering centerpiece of the indictment which could have a serious impact on DA Fani Willis's case if it is ruled inadmissible by ill-gotten means.
ETA: Lol!There you go again.
@Ingomike "I dont know but I am confident that that there is some tactical reason we don’t know and we likely will never know. But you ALWAYS choose the worst interpretation when it involves Trump."
There is a flipside to someone always choosing negative interpretations which is the other side flipping it seems to always choose positive interpretations to run cover, dismiss and never question why.
Can you imagine what the INGO GP watercooler talk would be if the implications of what you posted were about DeSantis and a newly rekindled love affair with CfG.
I disagree... and am not part of that "we".I guess the argument now is that it's too late to bring any negativity to light. Trump will be the nominee and we gotta run with what we have in the general.
What time is it? There is no candidate for president acceptable to me to receive my vote... not Trump, not Biden, not Kennedy.Know what time it is. Stop going hmmm... and get with the positive.
Dunno. Just reporting differing points of view.House votes to force sale of TikTok by Chinese owner - Washington Examiner
The House has passed legislation that will force TikTok to separate itself from its parent company in China, or risk being banned in the United States.www.washingtonexaminer.com
Is Rand wrong or Wong?
House votes to force sale of TikTok by Chinese owner - Washington Examiner
The House has passed legislation that will force TikTok to separate itself from its parent company in China, or risk being banned in the United States.www.washingtonexaminer.com
Is Rand wrong or Wong?
Rand marches to the beat of a different drummer... Bless him... and I'm glad he does because I would prefer "misses" on the big C Constitution side rather than vice versa... but in this case I think he is wrong, or at the very least, misguided. If the bill had anything to do with "content", then yes, it would be a 1A issue. It doesn't and it's not.Dunno. Just reporting differing points of view.
Kids spend a lot more time on Instagram. They are not wanting to stop Tik Tok because it is brainwashing kids. They say it is because the app can steal info from phones. It can't do that if you do not use it.
The first Amendment covers our people having the right to watch that nonsense and be "brainwashed" if they so desire.
If, as you fail to mention in Trump's case, that hypothetical democrat politician had raised concerns about voting irregularities, the validity of which could be easily determined, and asked for an examination of said claims in order to find more legitimate votes, they would be on sound grounds to make such a requestHad the shoe been on the other foot and Biden uttered "we need to find 17,000" votes to a Democrat SoS... would that have been hunkie-dorie with the INGO majority? Or would it be deemed nefarious?
I think we know the answer... hence, duplicity.
I thought you called for backup!Why did you show up and ruin their Trump bash party?
- Leviticus 19:27 - "Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head, but rather let it grow long and golden, and swirl it across the top."