I've seen a cop drive exactly the speed limit and light up a car as soon as the car cleared the cop's front bumper.
Had one of our officers do that to me (pulled me over) one night last year. I had some not so nice things to say to him about it.
I've seen a cop drive exactly the speed limit and light up a car as soon as the car cleared the cop's front bumper.
Had one of our officers do that to me (pulled me over) one night last year. I had some not so nice things to say to him about it.
If speed limit is 55, cop is going 45, I sure will pass him. Actually have a time or two,
I don't have anything to show him that will get me out of a ticket.
If the officer is at the posted speed limit then no passing. If the officer is below the posted limit then pass away as long as you're not over the limit. I don't think impeding traffic applies if you're doing the speed limit as they shouldn't technically be able to pass you therefore you're not impeding. That said I'm sure those can be argued in court until the end of civilization without a clear winner.
I thought you HAD to move over for faster traffic regardless of whether or not the passing motorist was speeding. Or am I mistaken??
Blue privilege! Blah blah blah.... higher standard!
I don't have marked car, I wasn't irritated because he pulled me over and I'm an officer. I was irritated because I don't think an officer driving the posted speed limit on the interstate and pulling anyone over who dares pass them is a reasonable thing to do.
As an officer, perhaps you can answer a question: Is there any kind of "rule of thumb" for pulling someone over? 5 MPH over? 10? Is it a per officer idea (e.g. each officer has to decide how fast a driver must be going to pull him/her over)? Or is it per department?
If an officer is in a ticket writing mood (or that's their primary responsibility), I think the majority are on the "9 is fine, 10 you're mine" thought process. Once you hit 65 in a 55 you're running a significantly higher risk of getting a ticket.
I don't have marked car, I wasn't irritated because he pulled me over and I'm an officer. I was irritated because I don't think an officer driving the posted speed limit on the interstate and pulling anyone over who dares pass them is a reasonable thing to do.
Unless, of course, you're on 465 wherein if you're going 65, as I do (as indicated by my speedometer needle. Guess I may not actually be going that fast), you're still one of the slow cars on the road.
Know what'll really get this thread going? Let's talk about speeding cops! Muhahahahahaha.
This is pretty much how my son works.If an officer is in a ticket writing mood (or that's their primary responsibility), I think the majority are on the "9 is fine, 10 you're mine" thought process. Once you hit 65 in a 55 you're running a significantly higher risk of getting a ticket.
I don't have marked car, I wasn't irritated because he pulled me over and I'm an officer. I was irritated because I don't think an officer driving the posted speed limit on the interstate and pulling anyone over who dares pass them is a reasonable thing to do.
So true. Traffic flow is far more important on a divided highway or interstate that a specific speed though you still get the impatient schmuck that must weave through traffic to gain two car lengths from his previous position.I remember years ago, I think just after they had lowered the speed on I-69 to 55 around Ft Wayne. In morning rush hour traffic I found myself behind a cop driving exactly 55. No one dared to pass him. I was a few cars behind him, and in my rear view mirror I could see cars bunched up bumper to bumper driving 55mph for as far as I could see. I thought that ****ing dickhead is causing a way more dangerous situation than if people just drove at their normal speed.