I open carry at every primary and general election date.
No problems. I cringe at "new law" but OK I understand.
BTW, the reason this is getting attention is because of the work of INGO members.
I open carry at every primary and general election date.
No problems. I cringe at "new law" but OK I understand.
BTW, the reason this is getting attention is because of the work of INGO members.
You wonKt have a problem at the polls in at least one county.
New law allows guns at polling places| WLFI- Tippecanoe County, Indiana
My polling place is actually in Oakland University in Bedford, so I'm not sure I can carry there
Kirk takes the bus to West Lafayette. "No, Kirk, they will just pass laws forbidding you on the bus. Just sit in the back of the bus and everything will be OK."
Because it is a school. But now I am starting to vaguely remember something about a distinction between "school" and a university. Does Oakland University not fall under the definition of a school? I'm new and still trying to wrap my head around all of this.
Is it that bad there? If so, it should present no problem for the Earl of Devonshire, for slipping past border guards and sentries is but child's play for our globe-trotting grandmaster of guise. That's where he whips out his ready-made documents identifying himself as (either) Reichsleiter Kurt von Freimann or - depending on the uniform they're wearing - Comrade Commissar and 1-digit party member Fremanov, and they wave him on through out of fear they may be sent to a Konzentrationslager or gulag for having the audacity to delay him.You wish to enter West Lafayette? Your papers, please!
identifying himself as (either) Reichsleiter Kurt von Freimann
Ausgezeichnet!I am only this when goose-stepping around the neighborhood with ruler to check on the grass.
Here's the sweet ride:
Some on INGO have said that activism will cause an out cry for more stringent gun control.
It is funny you should mention busses. I for one think that it basicly the same fight, civil rights.
The difference being that the government will bend over backward to ensure that an individual from a minority does not have their "civil rights" violated and will prosecute anyone who does so.
The same government will usually not lift a finger to ensure that the same minority individual mentioned above can exercise his "natural right" or "God-given right" to self defense through use of a firearm.
Both are rights, and as such should be protected by the government. Sadly, in reality, some rights are "more important" than others in the government's view.
The government should treat the right to keep and bear firearms at least as importantly as "civil rights", especially since the right to keep and bear arms was specifically enshrined in the Second Amendment to the Constitution, but I don't expect to see that reality within my lifetime.