Here's a stumper for the crowd:
What should you do if someone bumps into your pregnant bacon and you're in Evansville at the time?
What then, huh?
Go to Denny's?
Here's a stumper for the crowd:
What should you do if someone bumps into your pregnant bacon and you're in Evansville at the time?
What then, huh?
Here's a stumper for the crowd:
What should you do if someone bumps into your pregnant bacon and you're in Evansville at the time?
What then, huh?
Lets see:
- Fighting is popular in Evansville according to OP
- OP has urges towards violence
- Bacon
My guess: Fight the urge to eat my pregnant bacon?
Here's what I'm wondering........
Why was the OP in the vehicle while the gf went inside?
Well, if people were properly responsible, and used appropriate 'bacon control', they wouldn't HAVE pregnant baconHere's a stumper for the crowd:
What should you do if someone bumps into your pregnant bacon and you're in Evansville at the time?
What then, huh?
Absolutely agree. That's why I left those parts out of my post. I was judging based only on the details I stated. Once you bring in others things change.What got the fire started was the OP saying that he wanted to beat some guys to death with his hands if it happened to him, or something along that line. Several of us pointed out that If you took it on yourself to beat a guy to death, and then found that you needed to shoot some guys.......... YOU would be the perceived aggressor. Do you not agree?
You don't have to abandon smart choices just because they aren't legally mandated. As someone who carries a firearm, it's your responsibility to have the cooler head in any situation.
One can be perfectly calm when telling another that they are being rude and disrespectful. When that person decides to take it to a physical level first with a shove and second with punches it becomes a self defense situation. My own opinions mirror a lot of what has already been said, I simply wanted to point out that if things happened as the OP described then the OP wouldn't be in the wrong to defend himself. To an extent, staying mute and allowing rude people to continue to be rude contributes to the decline of our social norms. In no way would I advocate getting physical with someone but we shouldn't have to refrain from telling someone their behavior isn't appropriate. Criminals and vagrants thrive on society's tolerance.See, this in and of itself is an issue IMHO. Let's say I get shoved. I have a choice of shoving back or simply leaving. What's it worth to me? Aggravate an already hostile person, or go home to my awesome family? Easy choice for me. A "girlfriend getting shoved" incident suddenly becoming a shooting incident is just horribly poor planning and judgement in my book. Getting shoved shouldn't automatically mean "game on". It should automatically mean, "grow up". You have to pick your words, and your battles, then decide what's most important in your life. In my opinion, if you had a perfectly good opportunity to leave, and then chose not to, escalated the situation and shot someone, then you weren't really defending your life. If you valued your life, you'd just be at home eating bacon sandwiches.
And that's why I lead with that. But at the point when words turn into punches you are well within your right to defend yourself if needed. As said above I was making my statements based only on the details I listed.You pretty much made our points with that one part of that one sentence.
Here's what I'm wondering........
Why was the OP in the vehicle while the gf went inside?
I think it's epic stupidity to wade into that situation, to go out of your way to confront someone based on the knowledge that you're carrying and the assumption that you'll be able to shoot him if he starts to beat your ass. That's just ONE of the elements of this particular vague scenario that bothers me, but it's a big one. I also think if the witnesses at the trial say that the first thing they noticed was "the defendant" (boyfriend) coming across the space/lot/whatever barking at this other guy, got up in his face, guy #2 shoved, and it turned into a fight, and then a gunfight, the defendant's going to have an uphill battle.
I think it's epic stupidity to wade into that situation, to go out of your way to confront someone based on the knowledge that you're carrying and the assumption that you'll be able to shoot him if he starts to beat your ass. That's just ONE of the elements of this particular vague scenario that bothers me, but it's a big one. I also think if the witnesses at the trial say that the first thing they noticed was "the defendant" (boyfriend) coming across the space/lot/whatever barking at this other guy, got up in his face, guy #2 shoved, and it turned into a fight, and then a gunfight, the defendant's going to have an uphill battle.
Oh, yeah? What do you know, anyway? Being all weak and puny like you are, I dismiss your opinion!!
Here's a stumper for the crowd:
What should you do if someone bumps into your pregnant bacon and you're in Evansville at the time?
What then, huh?
If I'm pumping gas watching all these scenarios presented here I have no clue who's good and who's bad ... all I know is they're a bunch of idiots that don't have their priorities straight. Screw being tough ... there's bacon at home.
I don't even want to know how you got your bacon pregnant.