If Jessica Six is there, would it be tolerable?Their reality city reminds me of the one in Logan's Run.
Caprica 6 would be better.If Jessica Six is there, would it be tolerable?
True. But the period between initial attempts by the powerful, before the final rebuff of the people, is very deadly for society. Human losses measured in the millions according to history. I'm genuinely surprised at how many mad men are alive at the same time. It was practically the leaders of all the countries of the world tripping over each other to become the most dominate authoritarian.Nothing new here.
This school of thought has been around for a very long time. It never gets traction because it doesn't work very well but yet sounds good on paper.
If I use the last 24 months as a measuring stick, I'd answer your question with, pretty ****ing far. I suppose some of the hesitation to push back by the people is lack of coordination, lack of leader and fear of .gov's monopoly on physical force (direct(ed) violence).How far into the misery do we have to get before some people begin to pay attention?
Agreed. Internally we're ****ed. The rule makers have seemingly gone ****ing crazy. The institutional agencies we might normally lean on to bridge a crazy political zeitgeist; yeah, those institutions have gone crazy too. I don't know who's 'running the show' so to speak.This is far closer to being an attainable goal for them this time around. Our nation is weaker than it's ever been mentally, physically, and financially.
Aren`t you the least bit worried that "Our Leaders" even have this school of thought ? How many attempts need to be made before being successful ? We are nothing but a science project to the Elite .
One example ..........It only took them a month or two to get the whole World to wear a mask ( that did nothing to combat the scare )
They are hoping for more people who think your way ..........They won`t have to "take" your belongings , you will gladly hand them over.
You don’t have to go far down the rabbit hole to find that it may be the same bunch.I don't know. Those kinds of ideas gained quite a bit of traction in 1917 in Russia and millions died as a result.
I agree with this. The government trampled existing laws, customs, medical protocols and our unalienable rights. None of those edicts helped. None. But when .gov says "no church services", the haven't exactly stopped me from worshipping. It was wrong, but it didn't necessarily feel personal. With the mask mandate it felt very, very personal. It's my face. The government required me to cover my face. I think that felt much more intimately personal. It was as if the king pointed at me directly and said, "Manifest, you, You! shall do as I say." Keeping pot shops and liquor stores open while forbidding church couldn't be more wrong. But it didn't feel as if those decisions were specifically directed at me personally.But since you comment on masks maybe you can help me understand this: During COVID our government violated the first and second amendments, drove millions into poverty, destroyed businesses, eliminated the right to peacefully assemble, stopped people from worshipping and closed some gun stores. These were grievous acts of oppression unprecedented in our country. They strike at our basic civil rights and will likely be used again in the future. However, the most outrage, and your example, has been on mask mandates. Why? They seem trivial compared to suspension of constitutional rights.
The WEF and their agenda is hardly a talking point of someone`s "Opinion Piece " .1. He puts tremendous emphasis on the "Welcome to 2030" article and yes, it's scary, but it was written six years ago by a junior member of the Danish parliament as an opinion piece. She's a member of the Social Democrats and of course has a socialist opinion.
2. A report classified as a "social justice report" by the AMA. Yeah, the AMA is a lobby group with leftest and anti-gun views.
3. The Vatican? They've leaned left for a very long time.
I can prove any point I wish if I can use published opinion pieces and reports from lobbying groups as evidence.
My point is there's nothing new here. There have been leftest groups forever and they have been spouting leftest nonsense for the whole time.
But since you comment on masks maybe you can help me understand this: During COVID our government violated the first and second amendments, drove millions into poverty, destroyed businesses, eliminated the right to peacefully assemble, stopped people from worshipping and closed some gun stores. These were grievous acts of oppression unprecedented in our country. They strike at our basic civil rights and will likely be used again in the future. However, the most outrage, and your example, has been on mask mandates. Why? They seem trivial compared to suspension of constitutional rights.
As far as me handing over my possessions willingly?.... Clearly we've never met.
Haven't mentioned it in awhile. They are coming ladies and gentlemen. Much like today, these mother******* who are meeting behind closed doors and taking it upon themselves to redesign how not only this nation but all of them won't have to play by the same rules as us peons.
I hope they pack a lunch. This rhetoric by its very nature classifies every single active member of the WEF to be an enemy of our country, foreign or domestic.
Haven't mentioned it in awhile. They are coming ladies and gentlemen. Much like today, these mother******* who are meeting behind closed doors and taking it upon themselves to redesign how not only this nation but all of them won't have to play by the same rules as us peons.
I hope they pack a lunch. This rhetoric by its very nature classifies every single active member of the WEF to be an enemy of our country, foreign or domestic.
the republic is dead.
They won`t have to "take" your belongings , you will gladly hand them over.
Used to just be “it’s for the children” now it’s for our own good.The WEF and their agenda is hardly a talking point of someone`s "Opinion Piece " .
So should I mark you down as " Not the least bit worried that "Our Leaders" even have this school of thought ? "
You seem pretty confident that our leaders just want the best for us and are just here to help .......
Not sure I can help you understand anything if you can`t see the Power we give our leaders by "Complying " to bogus rules .
As far as you handing anything over .....why even comment or bring it up since it will never happen to you,
I thought you said , that school of thought never gets traction because it doesn't work very well.............So why worry
What I have to come to believe is that WE are "the children".Used to just be “it’s for the children” now it’s for our own good.
What we see is the expansion of the “common good.”
I’ve read several anarchist writings talking about how there should not be any such thing because it requires you to accept costs for decisions that aren’t yours”
“To serve man”