This thread is a fine example of why the fed gov should not be involved in OUR schools.
I'm sure common core will fix it.
Or parents should be much more involved in their children's lives. If they can't take the time to do that, wrap it up.
This thread is a fine example of why the fed gov should not be involved in OUR schools.
I'm sure common core will fix it.
It's not a behavior. It's a skill set, or a lack thereof. And that isn't remedied by an increase in their compensation rate.I'm an Math aficionado, aced several multi-variate calculus and linear algebra courses in college, read books on abstract algebra for fun*, yet I frequently have a mental block where I screw up the change I hand to a cashier-- thinking I'll get an even dollar amount back but really just confusing everyone and getting my pennies back. I don't think there is a strong correlation between accuracy in numerical calculation and intelligence. I'm fairly confident that even if some combination of calculators and apathy has made more recent high school graduates statistically weaker with mathematical calculations, we'll probably still fare ok as a society. Kenneth John Freeman wrote the following around 1909, in reference to misbehaving children of ancient times:
The counts of the indictment are luxury, bad manners, contempt for authority, disrespect to elders, and a love for chatter in place of exercise. …
Children began to be the tyrants, not the slaves, of their households. They no longer rose from their seats when an elder entered the room; they contradicted their parents, chattered before company, gobbled up the dainties at table, and committed various offences against Hellenic tastes, such as crossing their legs. They tyrannised over the paidagogoi and schoolmasters.
I support paying them $15.00 per hour despite their mistakes, expecting their behavior will improve over time or they will be displaced in the workforce.
* Abstract algebra made me aware of the Peano axioms, which can be used to formally derive addition and subtraction. Didn't make me any better at adding or subtracting. More entertainingly, it alerted me to the conundrum "Does the set of all sets which contain themselves as proper subsets contain itself?" and I think I accept the axiom of choice. I think a more interesting question is whether math was invented or discovered.
.
I support paying them $15.00 per hour despite their mistakes, expecting their behavior will improve over time or they will be displaced in the workforce.
You'd be amazed at how many adults can't read a tape measure.
You'd be amazed at how many adults can't read a tape measure.
I'm still in the habit of thinking to myself as I measure "OK, that's 35 and a half and a sixteenth", instead of 35 and nine sixteenths. Just the way my brain works. But I still can measure and cut you as many boards as you need, all within a 32nd of an inch.
I also remember my days running the cash register at Hook Drugs (remember them?). I always dreaded it when someone gave me mixed coins instead of bills, because I just don't have the ability to do that kind of math in my head. Luckily, the registers at Hooks were the kind that allowed you to enter the amount they gave you and would tell you the amount of change required. Cool, until some old fart would give me a ten on a $8.37 purchase, then wait till I entered that, then he'd whip out a quarter and a dime and say "Here, take this too".......just for the pure pleasure of watching me struggle with that.
I still can't do math in my head the way many people can, but I'm sorry that I spent so many years feeling like I was retarded for my inabilities (yeah, math isn't the only one). And I'm sorry that it took me so many years to figure out that I have abilities that few people share. I can memorize very complex structures (or imaginary structures dealing with computer systems) and manipulate them in my head so I can test what works and what doesn't work. I do a job that nobody else where I work can do, and they pay me very well for doing it.
And I will never forget the smart-assed smirks on the faces of those old farts at Hooks who got the biggest kick by pointing out that, yes, I can't always give you proper change without the register telling me how much. (glad to make your day buddy, you're welcome).
The problem with young people today isn't that they're dumb, it's that the adults in their lives haven't raised them well and haven't taught them well. Most of them will be glad to learn skills if there is someone willing to teach them instead of just dismissing them as hopeless rejects.
Point is, there should be no artificial limits on my pay other than the market value of my work. A minimum wage means that people who really suck at the job are paid as well as people who excel. I've done jobs I wasn't very good at, and I wasn't paid very well either. And I've done some jobs very well and have been paid well. That's is how it should be.
I agree, but the OP seems to believe that the reason his Taco Bell cashier shouldn't get paid more is because she was dumb and discourteous, not because the qualifications of her job didn't justify it.
Not at all. If you read through the thread, you'll see my major point was that the cashier wasn't suited for the job she was doing. Maybe she would be a better fit in the kitchen making the food. Much of that falls on management who failed to put her in a position to succeed.
When working in fast food you have to be flexible and able to work all the different roles. Why pay someone $15 an hour if their skill set limits them to working only one position? Shouldn't the business owner have the option to set the pay rate based on the skill set?
Zombie thread lives!!!!
I agree, but the OP seems to believe that the reason his Taco Bell cashier shouldn't get paid more is because she was dumb and discourteous, not because the qualifications of her job didn't justify it.
She was dumb and discourteous. She should be paid less than a smart courteous worker doing the same job. But if it's a minimum wage type job, they can't pay her anything less.