Are you sure you aren't a Hillary supporter? I see ridiculous twisting of words, ridiculous spin, and you're even pulling the racist card out.
Try actually listening to his words for once, maybe you should read transcripts instead of listening.
"We won with young, we won with old, we won with highly educated, we won with poorly educated, I love the poorly educated. We're the smartest people, with the most loyal people."
It takes a lot of bias, hate, and angst to twist that to mean "my supporters are poorly educated."
And the mask comes off, a dyed in the wool Hillary cheer leader finally reveals himself.
... what? I posted pictures of Trump supporters counting ballots. Then you said, "I certainly hope that if Rubio had won Nevada that you would be voicing the same criticisms just as vociferously. But I wouldn't bet the farm on it"
Rather than address the Trump supporters counting ballots, you made a baseless claim that I wouldn't criticize it if they were Rubio supporters. Rather than address the photos and the legality of what they were doing... you went after me, and questioned my integrity.
"Caucuses are not directly governed by law, as their rules are imposed by state party organizations, not the government. They are actions of party bylaw. But even those rules appear to have been either brazenly flouted or – at best – not clearly defined to volunteers and activists.
The rule against wearing candidate apparel, for example, appears to originate in the mists of previous caucus tradition, rather than any codified party statute, though even this is entirely unclear."
The state GOP tweeted later in the evening to clarify the situation:
Nevada GOP ✔@NVGOP
It's not against the rules for volunteers to wear candidate gear. Volunteers went through extensive training & are doing a great job
Source: Nevada caucuses chaos: reports of double voting, Trump attire on poll staff | US news | The Guardian
I know it must be absolutely infuriating to see criticism of your guy, and how infuriating it must be for you to not understand what Twitter is... but those aren't my problems.
No more infuriating I would think than waiting for Trump to falter ... and waiting, and waiting ...
Beyond this, if you don't want to discuss or debate anything I post here... and just want to hit at me... it's just trolling and you won't be seeing any further responses from me (as I won't be seeing any of yours.) Can we play nice and talk about candidates instead of each other?
Invitation accepted. Would like to see the rules on allowable arguments loosened a bit but will work towards that
You were wrong. I would absolutely criticize them if they were supporters of Rubio, Cruz, Carson, Fiorina, anyone. You made up a thing, and I refuted it... even though I really didn't need to because you made it about me for some reason. If you've got some weird obsession or adoration with me, get in line. If you have something to confess, do it in PM. This public thing is embarrassing. Otherwise, please put me on your ignore list.
I have seen this strategem before. I believe you wound up telling the other individual (twangerbanger? can't remember will look later) to 'get off your ass'
Cruz is FROM Texas! And given the amount of Hispanics living there, and Trump's beliefs, Cruz should be smashing Trump. For Cruz's sake, I hope Texas is a winner take all state, because a mediocre showing by Trump could be very telling.
Texas is not winner take all. No state primary prior to March 15 is allowed to be winner take all.
Texas is not winner take all. No state primary prior to March 15 is allowed to be winner take all.
Cruz is FROM Texas! And given the amount of Hispanics living there, and Trump's beliefs, Cruz should be smashing Trump. For Cruz's sake, I hope Texas is a winner take all state, because a mediocre showing by Trump could be very telling.
Trump overwhelmingly won the Hispanic vote in Nevada. And those Hispanics are not likely Puerto Ricans, Dominicans and Cubans. They are Mexicans. If he won the Hispanic vote after his comments about Mexico, that is telling. Trump also inexplicably pulls a lot of votes from evangelicals. Hispanics and evangelicals should be in the bag for Cruz, but nope. It's like Trump could shoot somebody in the middle of the street and his supporters would still vote for him.
I think Cruz might eke out a win in Texas. Maybe. But in the rest of the Super Tuesday states, I think he is in for more participation trophies.
Cesar Chavez, organizer of (primarily Hispanic) farm labor, was fervently anti-illegal immigration as the illegals depressed farm wages.If you put in the amount of work and money required to immigrate here legally, you're going to really really be upset with those who get a free ride.
It's no surprise mexicans support him, to me anyway.
WHAT? Really?I would just have to point out, if Rubio can't beat Trump why assume he could beat Hitlery?
Seeing a different thought out there on "Who would you rather have in office, Hillary or Trump?"
One person responded, "Honestly? Hillary. She'll enact her leftism as a Leftist, not as someone with the imprimatur of conservatism."
We would even be able to expect Republicans in Congress to act like an opposition party, at least. Trump would be out of control, and confuse opposition to his leftist agenda.
There is absolutely no way that voters would allow a Republican to follow a Trump administration. At least with Hillary, we could run a Conservative against her in 4/8 years.
Thoughts?
My thoughts are that you are dangerously wrong. If you really think it would be better for conservatives to have Hillary as president over Trump then you are beyond delusional.
Restroyer said:My thoughts are that you are dangerously wrong. If you really think it would be better for conservatives to have Hillary as president over Trump then you are beyond delusional.