This was all over my FB feed yesterday:
Ted Cruz tops GOP field for first time in new national poll - CNNPolitics.com
Ted Cruz tops GOP field for first time in new national poll - CNNPolitics.com
I think I've mentioned this upthread, but if it is Sanders v. Trump, I could vote for [strike]gridlock[/strike] Sanders. He would not have a mandate. He would not have Congress. He would be ineffective.
I can't find where I've ever said that... but why not refute/answer what I said before putting words in my mouth? Why can't anyone here tell me why Trump is suddenly exactly what he says he is, without deflecting to other candidates or ignoring the question altogether? He's a populist democrat, always has been, always will be.
Moving on...
Ann Coulter makes me embarrassed for other racists
Coulter on Haley Endorsing Rubio: She?d Replace Confederates with ?Bangladeshi Migrants? | Mediaite
All INGO posters look alike after awhile.I thought you had posted that you would vote for Sanders before you'd vote for Trump. Maybe it was someone else.
I may be mistaken. I thought you had posted that you would vote for Sanders before you'd vote for Trump. Maybe it was someone else.
All INGO posters look alike after awhile.
Negative. Still an irrelevant question. Nothing I ask gets answers, yet "SO YOU'D VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT THEN!?" demands this many posts?
I oppose Trump's candidacy on the principle that he's a fraud. 100% fact: He is a Democrat. He should not be running under the Republican name. I'm not carrying that argument to the General Election because he shouldn't be allowed to make it that far. I'm still counting on something happening to prevent that.
So... I reject the entire premise of Trump vs Sanders/Clinton. It's not how these elections are supposed to work. It's fine if, say... Kasich won the nomination... and you call him a "democrat". Sure, he's GOP somewhat... but he does have some lefty leanings. But Trump is actually a Democrat. An real Democrat. He is not GOP. He is not a Republican. He is not an "outsider". He is not a Conservative. He's abusing the system, he's lying, and he should not make it to the general.
So, I'm not answering "gotcha" questions on that premise.
Rubio
Cruz
Fiorina
Kasich
Bush
Carson
Christie
Sanders - Clinton
Trump doesn't appear in your ranking. I had asked where you wanted him ranked. You never answered so I never included your vote in the tally.
Upon further reflection, this struck me: while I (vehemently) disagree with Sanders about what is best for America, I have no doubt that Sanders will do what he believes is best for America. I have no such hope with Trump. I believe he has consistently proven he will do what is best for Donald Trump, regardless of circumstance. That is not a president we want.I'd have to really think on that. Sanders is a sure thing. He's gonna try to do what he says. No doubt.
I don't see a coattail effect with Sanders. I can see populist-Trump browbeating and bullying members of Congress to bend to his will. And his bank accounts. Do we really think Trump will give up control of his investments to a presidential blind trust?When we vote for president, we don't have the luxury of knowing the result of the Senate race. I wouldn't assume the Dems won't win back the Senate.
You may be thinking of me. People get me and GPIAhnhurhnheh confused all the time, since we look so much alike.I may be mistaken. I thought you had posted that you would vote for Sanders before you'd vote for Trump. Maybe it was someone else.
You may be thinking of me. People get me and GPIAhnhurhnheh confused all the time, since we look so much alike.
With the Indiana Primary in may, I wonder which candidates will actually be left to choose from. I'd like to thank the primary process for allowing states like Iowa and New Hampshire to reduce the nation's choices of candidates.
Negative. Still an irrelevant question. Nothing I ask gets answers, yet "SO YOU'D VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT THEN!?" demands this many posts?
I oppose Trump's candidacy on the principle that he's a fraud. 100% fact: He is a Democrat. He should not be running under the Republican name. I'm not carrying that argument to the General Election because he shouldn't be allowed to make it that far. I'm still counting on something happening to prevent that.
So... I reject the entire premise of Trump vs Sanders/Clinton. It's not how these elections are supposed to work. It's fine if, say... Kasich won the nomination... and you call him a "democrat". Sure, he's GOP somewhat... but he does have some lefty leanings. But Trump is actually a Democrat. An real Democrat. He is not GOP. He is not a Republican. He is not an "outsider". He is not a Conservative. He's abusing the system, he's lying, and he should not make it to the general.
So, I'm not answering "gotcha" questions on that premise.
If he was a democrat, he would not have won any republican votes.
Most republicans don't feel the same you do.
Or maybe they don't care that much because he says what they want to hear.
That means people are willing to not vote based on party if they really relate to a candidate. Frustrated Americans are voting for Trump.
Edit: Bush Campaign Sources: Campaign Out of Money. Pay Ends Saturday.
Ted Cruz campaign continues to play in the mud. Now passing off badly photoshopped images as truth.
Marco Rubio adviser: Ted Cruz campaign photoshopped Rubio-Obama picture - POLITICO
Cruz Campaign Communications Director Rick Tyler: "I am confident that our campaign would not use a photo that is not authentic."
I'd like to be able to vote for Cruz at the end of this if he comes out on top... but ****ty dishonesty can only push someone so far.
And before "lol not a big deal", the Reuters photoshopped photos in Gaza were just "pictures" too. Meant to sway opinion. Similar to the Cruz partisans attacking those who reported on his Iowa mailers as liars...until it was confirmed he did send the things
Here's the stock image they got it from:
And the shop