My high effiency washing machine can't spin like a group of Trump supporters.
Oh. So. Let me get this straight. The fake conservatives are the people who don't want Trump. And the "real" conservatives are the ones DO want Trump. Okay then.
Well, I guess you're well trained. Did you raise your right hand and say hail Trump at the rally?
Yep.
Read up on Cruz and Rubio's voting record and compare that to Trump's policy. If you're going to scream "WHHHHAAAA HE'S LYING WHAAAAAA" endlessly, then of course we can't have a conversation.
Ahh I almost forgot Trump was Hitler this election cycle.
Well, seriously, no. He's not Hitler. I find his pledge kinda creepy though. So did you pledge?
That's it? Okay. I guess originality isn't for everyone. I'll accept your generic insult if it's all you have.
That said, yeah, it's not been the best week for Republicans. I've said before the ****ty process has left us with a choice between the bottom of the barrel. The two Republicans with the best chance of winning have the worst favorability ratings. At least Cruz's favorability rating is a little better than Hillary's.
If Trump wins outright, yeah, sure. If not, well, the party gets to decide who is the nominee. If there is a contested convention and Trump has a large plurality lead over everyone else, then they should respect that. If it's within a hundred or two delegates though, it's anyone's game.
Hey, wait. I thought you guys wanted to blow **** up. A brokered convention where Mit Romney comes out with the nomination would certainly blow **** up.
I'm not a Trump supporter because I think he's conning you. And I don't believe Trump is the god you think he is. I'll vote for him if he wins the nomination, but at that point I'll feel like it's futile.
1) On the neocon accusation: I don't get to join that club. Not that I want to anyway, being a non-believer and all. It's an evangelicals only club. That is one of the issues I have against Cruz.
2) As you've guessed, I'm not all that fond of Cruz. As I've said, all that's left is bottom of the Republican barrel. Cruz, lying, smarmy ****bag that he is, is IMHO a safer bet than Trump.
3) We can't have a conversation anyway. You won't accept any legitimate criticism of Trump. And you've been offered plenty. I fully accept all criticism of Rubio or Cruz or Kasich or any of the other candidates in the race. And I've leveled much criticism where I think criticism is due even for the candidate I wanted. No one's perfect or even all that great. They're all politicians. There are just levels of not-greatness.
4) Not all Trumpers are though. Some INGOers fully admit Trump's faults, and they don't care because yadda, yadda, middle finger, yadda. I've repeatedly said, yeah. Okay. I get that. But if the conversation involves blindly having to accept that Trump is more than he is, I'm just not going to be much fun in that conversation.
Based on what? Pollster speculation..
It almost sounds as if, you don't want to make America great again?
Nobody who ever thought Robio was getting it done should ever go there
Oh, I do want to make America great again. I just doubt Trump will actually do that. I think he's feeding you a con job through that straw.
It occurred to me recently, though, that if it ends up Cruz (which I can live with, despite the Judas act) that you all may need to thank Trump for making it possible. Because Trump is the only thing I can see that could make the GOPe coalesce around Cruz
The only fault I won't concede to is ones that involve fabricating your own story to fit your own narrative. This is why I repeatedly hammer you when your only real opposition to Trump is based on fear, uncertainty, and doubt.
Those aren't valid reasons to take issue with something. Not saying you can't be cautious and that you can't think for yourself.
Posters, including me, have posted legitimate concerns about Trump. You just rationalize them away.
I'm only regurgitating rhetoric for trolling purposes. But you raise a good point, and I partially agree with you that it could be a possibility. Only time will tell.
Meanwhile it is a certainty that hilldog wants to **** us.
I know disturbing mental image.
You mean like how you argued that he "changed" on H-1B visas when he never did?
I argued the point of what he told the moderator. She called him on the wording from his website. He did not dispute the quote she gave, instead, he said he's changed his opinion on that and would change the website. That's what he said. It's in the transcript. I can google that for you again if you want. And you can again rationalize or deny it again.
For what it's worth, his website no longer reads as she originally quoted. If he now supports using H-1B for its intended purpose only, and not using it to hire cheap tech help to avoid paying qualified American candidates higher salaries, I agree with him on that.