The OFFICIAL Trump/HRC/2016 General Election Thread...

[jamil]

Well, I wouldn't send ST6, if that's what you mean; but I would authorize a drone strike. Draw your own conclusions

Drone strike? Kinda harsh. People get to have and advocate for different political views.

 

[foszoe]

It all makes sense now the New York FBI was counting on the Hatch Act to protect Hillary Clinton because they didn't think the director would open the case this close to the election which is why they delayed the big reveal to their director until last week.

 

[1DOWN4UP]

WSJ now confirming the Clinton Foundation is under FBI investigation.

I still predict an easy Clinton victory... but now she'll have zero mandate, and the investigations will bog her down to near uselessness.

An easy victory?Near uselessness?I will assume that if this mess she created had not happened,you would have thought her to be Useful.I can read between your lines. He He He

 

[T.Lex]

Hahaha. Well played

Kellyanne Conway asks if Hillary Clinton will 'accept results if she loses election' * | Daily Mail Online

Trump's campaign manager Kellyanne Conway asks if Hillary Clinton will 'accept the results if she loses'


Hoist

I don't understand. I thought she already answered that in the debate when it happened. She said she would. I'm sure that probably included a Gorey legal challenge to the hanging chads, etc., but she said she would accept it.

 

[printcraft]

It all makes sense now the New York FBI was counting on the Hatch Act to protect Hillary Clinton because they didn't think the director would open the case this close to the election which is why they delayed the big reveal to their director until last week.

Boom.

 

[jamil]

I don't understand. I thought she already answered that in the debate when it happened. She said she would. I'm sure that probably included a Gorey legal challenge to the hanging chads, etc., but she said she would accept it.

The thing that has changed is now it's Hillary claiming a sort of "rigged" election since the Comey Letter was sent. So now that the tables have been turned at least a little, it's a fair question. Given the Comey letter and her assertion that it is partisan, would she accept the election results on Tuesday if she loses?

I would expect her answer is similar to Trump's, "it depends".

 

[T.Lex]

Ah, right.

Well, she's already fumbled the handling of this. She just doesn't have the instincts to be a politician. She might just say something that stupid.

 

[foszoe]

I don't understand. I thought she already answered that in the debate when it happened. She said she would. I'm sure that probably included a Gorey legal challenge to the hanging chads, etc., but she said she would accept it.

We're used to Republicans saying something similar in a debate then not meaning it when the outcome wasn't favorable.

See no reason to treat Hillary Clinton any different

 

[BugI02]

They had been making much of Trump's guarded answer to that question. It is entertaining to see the shoe on the other foot - and it seems to be pinching a bit

 

[jamil]

Ah, right.

Well, she's already fumbled the handling of this. She just doesn't have the instincts to be a politician. She might just say something that stupid.

Saying "it depends" is reasonable if you're saying that you'd accept the results unless there are unusual circumstances that make the results legitimately dubious. Both Bush and Gore made and retracted concessions in 2000. And understandably so.

As it stands now, both Hillary's and Trump's complaining about fowl play are unsubstantiated accusations. But unless they're caught red handed that's just not an acceptable reason to not accept the election results.

 

[AmmoManAaron]

This appears to be stuff that would probably need to be classified. Also notice that someone from Morgan Stanley was CC'ed on this email.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1069

Tom Nides is COO of Morgan Stanley and was Vice Chairman at the time. His wife is Virginia Moseley, CNN Vice President and Deputy Washington Bureau Chief.

An insider trading tip like that (first mover advantage to know Iranian markets are going to open up) is probably worth billions.

 

[T.Lex]

This appears to be stuff that would probably need to be classified. Also notice that someone from Morgan Stanley was CC'ed on this email.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1069

Tom Nides is COO of Morgan Stanley and was Vice Chairman at the time. His wife is Virginia Moseley, CNN Vice President and Deputy Washington Bureau Chief.

An insider trading tip like that (first mover advantage to know Iranian markets are going to open up) is probably worth billions.

Wow.

Now THAT's some interesting stuff.

Stu Eizenstat is a big deal in certain communities, too.

 

[T.Lex]

Heya AmmoManAaron - that WikiLeaks search thing is pretty cool.

Mention of Bayh:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/41419

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/27984

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/20730

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9806

Bunch of others. If I'm Young, I start jumping on these.

 

[jamil]

Heya AmmoManAaron - that WikiLeaks search thing is pretty cool.

Mention of Bayh:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/41419

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/27984

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/20730

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9806

Bunch of others. If I'm Young, I start jumping on these.

Does Young even know about them?

 

[indiucky]

 

[ArcadiaGP]

Obama says men must not have doubts about Hillary Clinton just because she's a woman... urges men to ask themselves if they are just being sexist by opposing Hillary - says Michelle is not just his equal but his superior

What a ***** little *****.

 

[jamil]

Obama says men must not have doubts about Hillary Clinton just because she's a woman... urges men to ask themselves if they are just being sexist by opposing Hillary - says Michelle is not just his equal but his superior

What a ***** little *****.

Um, no. I don't care at all if she's a woman or not. I have doubts about her because she's has shown herself to be corrupt, and she is a leading advocate for gun control.

 

[jbombelli]

My doubts on Hillary have nothing to do with her being a woman. Nothing whatsoever.

 

[Greyson]

Obama says men must not have doubts about Hillary Clinton just because she's a woman... urges men to ask themselves if they are just being sexist by opposing Hillary - says Michelle is not just his equal but his superior

What a ***** little *****.

I don't dislike Obama because he's black.
I don't dislike Hillary because she's a woman.
... but I do have reasons to dislike them both (a lot).

 

[Leadeye]

Always follow the money