The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    RedneckReject

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Oct 6, 2012
    26,170
    63
    Indianapolis


    Just had some. It'll kick in soon. It's just been a really stressful day. Got up early, drove an hour south, waited for hours and hours, ran over a chicken, got to the range about 5 minutes too late to shoot because I got stuck by a freight train, had to medicate an animal that has very sharp claws and hates being medicated. It's been fun
     

    jdmack79

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Aug 20, 2009
    6,549
    113
    Lawrence County

    jdmack79

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Aug 20, 2009
    6,549
    113
    Lawrence County
    I wouldn't pay much more than the current bid for the 1964 slim. It is in fairly rough shape, although it looks to be mechanically sound. I'd also try to keep the 1962 under $30, although it is in much better shape than the 1964. Neither of them are worth a whole lot, considering they have both been "restored."

    On closer examination, go for the 1962. It hasn't been messed with and is in WAY better shape.
     

    mbills2223

    Eternal Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Dec 16, 2011
    20,138
    113
    Indy
    I wouldn't pay much more than the current bid for the 1964 slim. It is in fairly rough shape, although it looks to be mechanically sound. I'd also try to keep the 1962 under $30, although it is in much better shape than the 1964. Neither of them are worth a whole lot, considering they have both been "restored."

    I saw that the one looked a little rough. Are they tough to get cleaned up?
    Let's all outbid Mbills! :evilangel:

    :bat:

    I'm not sure I would want what he's bidding on

    :laugh:

    On closer examination, go for the 1962. It hasn't been messed with and is in WAY better shape.

    Roger.
     

    jdmack79

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Aug 20, 2009
    6,549
    113
    Lawrence County
    I saw that the one looked a little rough. Are they tough to get cleaned up?
    They are easily cleaned. The main problem lies with their finish. The plating on razors is extremely thin, so if you polish much you will go through it. Most razors look far worse than they really are due to built up soap scum. With a THOROUGH cleaning and sterilization, you can clean them up quite well.
     

    mbills2223

    Eternal Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Dec 16, 2011
    20,138
    113
    Indy
    They are easily cleaned. The main problem lies with their finish. The plating on razors is extremely thin, so if you polish much you will go through it. Most razors look far worse than they really are due to built up soap scum. With a THOROUGH cleaning and sterilization, you can clean them up quite well.

    That's what I was hoping to hear. I've seen a few that look pretty dirty and they seem to go significantly cheaper.

    I think I'm gonna get another mag. And a new mixer since mine is shot and I need to be able to make yummy treats to not share with you people

    What kinda mag? Porno mag?
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom