The variance on, say, free will vs Calvinism implies completely different things. It’s a pretty basic divisional split which resulted in a very foundational split in denominations.That's a weak argument. Interpretation in no way affects the underlying truth
Now do five scientists 'unpacking' what space time is or the quantum hall effect or frame dragging. They 'unpack' one idea (verse) and wind up saying 5 diffrent things, but that variance in no way affects the validity of the underlying idea
With the metaphysical realm we’re talking about a different kind of underlying truth. I doubt you think of it that way though. But indeed it is an unknowable truth that you believe by faith. What we discover through science is more like peeling layers of an onion to get to the underlying truth. Of course as the depth and breadth of knowledge on a given topic increases, the things “unpacked” between different scientists become less varied.