Looks like somebody is allergic to bullets to the back of the head.
Looks like somebody is allergic to bullets to the back of the head.
Cooper just admitted he had complete access to Hillary's server and had no security clearance
Confidential! Confidential! Confidential!
To: SecState
From: DoD, CincPacFlt
Subj: Suggested Far East Itinerary
Hey Hill. Awesome food at Jambahlah's in Bali. 2 for 1 banana daquiri's as well. See you there!
==========
Unfortunately, this is the state of secrecy for many confidential emails. Is the SecState or CincNavFlt's itinerary secret? Or should it be? Yeah, maybe. But, maybe not.
Cooper just admitted he had complete access to Hillary's server and had no security clearance
Yep, during her entire tenure as secretary of state she never sent or received 1 single classified or secret email through one of her 13 known blackberries or various computers.
NONE
Simply amazing! How did she get anything done! Awesomesauce!
Having had a high security clearance in the past, it is my observation that the government overclassifies almost everything. Bureaucrats classify some awfully routine and boring things.
Having had a high security clearance in the past, it is my observation that the government overclassifies almost everything. Bureaucrats classify some awfully routine and boring things.
Oh, I'm not "letting her off the hook". I'm making an observation about the bureaucracy. We overclassify information because we don't want anyone to have to think.
You can push your agenda all you wish. I just don't think banana daquiris represent state secrets. When everything becomes a matter of national security, it loses its meaning.
Show me where she put this country at risk by having a confidential document on her iPhone. Just one. Show me.
If you say she destroyed lots of emails, I'll also remind you that the Bush administration did the same thing. Not all information is important to be kept in an ordered state of electrons. Plus, if there is an important document that she destroyed SOMEONE ELSE still has it, don't they?
I think her treatment of emails shows a cavalier attitude toward security. Elitism. But, I don't necessarily think it is criminal for the reasons I described above: overclassification.
Now, I'll kindly apologize if you show me ONE document that is important to national security. And no, I don't think embarrassing memos about Angela Merkel's GERD problems and bad gas is a national secret.
Benghaaaaaaazzzzziiiiii. 8 committees couldn't prove your assertion. Please contact them for further info.
We saw some of the stuff that came out in Wikileaks from other government officials. They were, for the most part, petty gossip. The government classifies that stuff so we don't think they are idiots. Guess what? We KNOW they are idiots!
Benghaaaaaaazzzzziiiiii. 8 committees couldn't prove your assertion. Please contact them for further info.
We saw some of the stuff that came out in Wikileaks from other government officials. They were, for the most part, petty gossip. The government classifies that stuff so we don't think they are idiots. Guess what? We KNOW they are idiots!
Perhaps not, but we CAN prove that Hillary destroyed evidence that would be necessary for determining the validity of the assertions in question. Are you telling us that you consider the destruction of evidence of potential wrong-doing (above and beyond the destruction itself) is acceptable in your reckoning?