It's really nothing yet, but it's a start:
BREAKING: Georgia Supreme Court Reverses 'Lack Of Standing' In 2020 Election Case
BREAKING: Georgia Supreme Court Reverses 'Lack Of Standing' In 2020 Election Case. Today’s ruling may set the stage for further investigation into what actually occurred during November 2020.www.georgiarecord.com
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson ruled Monday night that two of Arizona Republican gubernatorial contender Kari Lake’s election complaints will proceed to trial.Now if only we could get AZ on board. Doubt PA would be any help though.
And the spin on that in the media “paraphrased” it as they could not have cheated.Trial going on in AZ. Doug in exhile on you tube just said witnesses testified that printers were printing smaller ballots on paper too big. Which means they can’t be read. And thrown out….. he testified machines are set up so no human error can happen. So someone intentionally went into machines and physically changed settings on machines on purpose 100% no doubt, no other way.
Yup. I also just saw that judge wants document or ballots brought in to look at and democrats must provide them asap. The camera showed the democrats faces after he said this…. It was like….” Oh crap now what do we do.” One witness said he look at 19 sheets of ballots and almost all of them didn’t work and caused machines to shut down because the used 20” paper instead of 19” paper. That could be a crap load of ballots from Republicans that got tossed then considering how much of this was done. I heard estimates from 25% and higher. Out of over 1 million voters that’s a bunch. Probably be ethical wrong doing but nothing “criminal” like you’re saying. Nothing to see here move along.And the spin on that in the media “paraphrased” it as they could not have cheated.
They proved that major chain of custody violations occurred. And the defense democrats seem to be putting forth wasn’t that they weren’t violating chain of custody, but that they can’t prove it was intentional so therefore the results stand.
Seems to me I hear that formulation A LOT on some forum site or otherbut that they can’t prove it was intentional so therefore the results stand.
Hey. The only proof I need is that it happened. You guys go off on everything GWP throws out and I’m just not impressed.Seems to me I hear that formulation A LOT on some forum site or other
That brings up a point. I've brought up Colorado several times, particularly the pragmatically acceptable dingbat's district, in which the results were held up partially because they had to "cure" the ballots that were rejected. AZ's voting oversite apparently isn't interested in "curing" ballots that would probably go against Democrats. If that attitude prevails in the Democrat led AZ voting oversight, is it a stretch to suspect that it prevails in others?Yup. I also just saw that judge wants document or ballots brought in to look at and democrats must provide them asap. The camera showed the democrats faces after he said this…. It was like….” Oh crap now what do we do.” One witness said he look at 19 sheets of ballots and almost all of them didn’t work and caused machines to shut down because the used 20” paper instead of 19” paper. That could be a crap load of ballots from Republicans that got tossed then considering how much of this was done. I heard estimates from 25% and higher. Out of over 1 million voters that’s a bunch. Probably be ethical wrong doing but nothing “criminal” like you’re saying. Nothing to see here move along.
I guess I'm still blackpilled on the whole process. I suspect the judge is just giving their day in court and regardless will find a way to dismiss anyway.Yup. I also just saw that judge wants document or ballots brought in to look at and democrats must provide them asap. The camera showed the democrats faces after he said this…. It was like….” Oh crap now what do we do.” One witness said he look at 19 sheets of ballots and almost all of them didn’t work and caused machines to shut down because the used 20” paper instead of 19” paper. That could be a crap load of ballots from Republicans that got tossed then considering how much of this was done. I heard estimates from 25% and higher. Out of over 1 million voters that’s a bunch. Probably be ethical wrong doing but nothing “criminal” like you’re saying. Nothing to see here move along.
Voter fraud should be treated as treason.In the event they are caught, prosecuted and convicted, what are the penalties? Who goes to jail, if at all, and for how long?
so if I rob a bank or commit any other major crime and I didn’t intend too, then I’m not guilty? Nice to know that is part of our written legal system of laws.but that they can’t prove it was intentional so therefore the results stand.