The misinformation In the beginning set the stage for the next 40 minutes of misinformation.
That would assume there's any left to be damaged.Bull****!
You shouldn't make stuff up Kirk it undermines your credibility.
Oh and woods isn't running for office.
Yet.
Like the way you answered right up when I asked how the kidnapping of Justina Pelletier was justified knowing the initial court hearing suppressed evidence that directly contradicted the state's claim?I am certain if I keep asking I'll get an answer to my request to the citation of Nixon saying what was claimed.
I mean, I am certain Libertarians only want the truth. That is what they are known for.
Like the way you answered right up when I asked how the kidnapping of Justina Pelletier was justified knowing the initial court hearing suppressed evidence that directly contradicted the state's claim?
We all know Kirk dodges questions he isn't comfortable with, then berates others for doing the same.
I'm sure we are not on the same page and I'll admit that droning on may have been excessive. When someone is wrong it's like nails on a chalkboard to me so it seems to take longer than it does for him to move on. So the preamble to his argument was 35 seconds of me saying, "no he didn't...you're an idiot" over and over to myself. He also brings up that incorrect nugget of information a couple of times throughout the rest of his comedy of errors. The rest of his speech was as ignorant as the beginning. Trust me i don't blame him, if i could weasel my way into one of those Al Sharpton, Jesse jackson, Radley Balko jobs where all i have to do is shout "militarization!" or "racism" and i immediately get a paycheck….I'd be a militarization/Racism shouting mother ****er!
His conclusions are absolute crap. Is Balko going to sue him for not citing him for the basis of his essay? He hasn't said anything monumental, just more of the same uniformed drivel.
ike the way you answered right up when I asked how the kidnapping of Justina Pelletier was justified knowing the initial court hearing suppressed evidence that directly contradicted the state's claim?
You're trying to say an entire 40 minute speech is discredited because of one short statement
Ok, and the citation is . . . where exactly?
Correct.
All day long, INGO mocks Republicans. INGO mocks Democrats. Oh, this person or politician is soooo stupid that they don't even know . . . .
When I point out that Libertarians get bunches of stuff wrong, the Libertarians hike up their skirts and run around the kitchen shrieking.
Good to know that Libertarians are a protected class.
Good to know that you know you're grasping at straws to make your point.
And a "bunch" of stuff wrong?
Correct.
All day long, INGO mocks Republicans. INGO mocks Democrats. Oh, this person or politician is soooo stupid that they don't even know . . . .
When I point out that Libertarians get bunches of stuff wrong, the Libertarians hike up their skirts and run around the kitchen shrieking.
Good to know that Libertarians are a protected class.
In 2012, Tom Woods campaigned for a Republican in the presidential primary. He then declined to make an endorsement in the general election.
So he's either a Republican or non-partisan. But don't let "the truth" get in the way of your witch hunt.
Oh, dear God, it is as if the Purity Police are on a schedule.
So now the INGOtarians are claiming that the Mises Institute is NOT libertarian? This is too rich.
Next they will be claiming that they do not write their own newsletters.