That is possible. I guess if he got pissed at them he could move Iowa to North Dakota. ND might not mind the swap.
Last I heard, ND was looking at changing its name to "Dakota".
That is possible. I guess if he got pissed at them he could move Iowa to North Dakota. ND might not mind the swap.
...down in your mother's basement. Where it's safe. And mommy can bring you hot pockets.
So did they ever find the rest of the Iowa votes, or are we sticking with 62%? Perhaps the number that keeps Bernie where he is.
"So Mrs. Lincoln, have you enjoyed the first 62% of this play?"
Were up to 71% now
Iowa Democrats said:There will be a minor correction to the last batch of results and we will be pushing an update momentarily.
Translated to real talk, “We’re not quite done changing the results”
We use computers every day for banking, medicine, engineering, etc., and we expect instantaneous results. How friggin' hard is it to have a computer count 1,2,3,4,5. . .
We use computers every day for banking, medicine, engineering, etc., and we expect instantaneous results. How friggin' hard is it to have a computer count 1,2,3,4,5. . .
Harder than it looks. This ain't Sesame Street counting.
Supposedly Hillary had a hand in the program design, so I’m sure the cheating and swindling were pegged at 11Not buying it. We trade stocks and currency instantaneously, so why can't the Democrats design a program to cheat and swindle more efficiently?
Supposedly Hillary had a hand in the program design, so I’m sure the cheating and swindling were pegged at 11
ETA: not so much a hand in it as ties to it, but still pegged at 11