Yeah, some heavy intimidation tactics going on there.
Yeah, but kinda lame at the same time.
I mean, POTUS Trump himself has gone after Cohen. Is Cohen then supposed to care what some junior rep from podunk [strike]Alabama[/strike] Florida says?
Yeah, some heavy intimidation tactics going on there.
Except what Gaetz did was possibly illegal and broke the rules of the House. He was warned about that, notwithstanding that the rules only going one way. You guys sure can spin a **** sandwich into ham.
Twitter really seems to bring out the inner dumbass in people.
Accusing Trump of everything from silent-but-deadlys up to the Lindbergh baby kidnapping for the past 2+ years really takes the impact out of anything Cohen could possibly say.
Oh, and Cohen being a confirmed a-hole doesn't hurt Trump.
We could use a little more omerta in this world.
Hildebeest had her own form of omerta - just kill the witnesses.
Speaking as a guy who represented a nationally ( (maybe internationally) know fugitive. later felon, who was deposed about said representation....and asserted attorney-client privilege dozens of times, let's just say that I don't think much of Cohen.
The key as an attorney is not committing crimes yourself such that there is no leverage to entice you to be a rat.
That attorney-client privilege could easily put you in a place I wouldn't want to be in.
Ever wonder why Trump didn't sue/isn't suing to keep Cohen from talking?
Pretty sure he waived the privilege (and some of this falls into some exceptions anyway).
If nothing else, but tweeting about what he did and didn't tell Cohen, he's waiving the privilege as to those topics.
Speaking as a guy who represented a nationally ( (maybe internationally) know fugitive. later felon, who was deposed about said representation....and asserted attorney-client privilege dozens of times, let's just say that I don't think much of Cohen.
The key as an attorney is not committing crimes yourself such that there is no leverage to entice you to be a rat.
Still within the SOL.
A judge is going to have to tell me that in the form of an order compelling testimony.
My issue isn't Trump's idiocy, it's Cohen being a slime.
A judge is going to have to tell me that in the form of an order compelling testimony. Then I'll fight it like an SOB and take all the appeals I can. Of course, this is all assuming that, myself, was smart enough to not break the law....an apparent Cohen failing.
My issue isn't Trump's idiocy, it's Cohen being a slime.
Honest question, how either descriptions non-reciprocal to the other?
It's not really that hard to avoid screwing yourself over.
Step 1- Want to not screw yourself over.
Cohen couldn't even get that far.
What if a client tells you she helped one of Hildebeest's witnesses commit "suicide"? You can't un-know something so that would put you would be in a risky position.