Is he a part of OCT?I....I.... (sigh) ...am speechless.
Well that is a new Lo for OCT
Is he a part of OCT?I....I.... (sigh) ...am speechless.
Well that is a new Lo for OCT
Is he a part of OCT?
I liked the way that target was quicker to check out, and had very helpful staff. However, I am now refusing to go there, because my wife dies not leave the house without her protection.
Is he a part of OCT?
According to OCT's Facebook page, they checked and confirmed he IS NOT a member of their organization. They also point out that what he is doing by unholstering his weapon and displaying it in Texas is illegal under current law and not condoned by them.
I think a more interesting story is that OC in Texas is getting a lot of momentum with the state legislators as well as Abbott and Davis, both contending to be the next Governor, openly supporting Open Carry of Handguns. I didn't see any mention of OC in Kansas either.
We are winning where it counts. It's like not being invited to the popular kids party but going home with the prom queen.
There are many gun owners who don't support the right to carry (or only support a narrow type or style of carry according to their own personal preferences).
I say good for them, even idiots should have access to post their opinions on the internet.
They're not necessarily our worst enemy, as they're easily dismissed in conversations such as these.
Do you mean those gun owners who think packing a gun is scary or those simply against oc a rifle? The former are hypocrites, however, I'd say the latter are far from idiots because they disagree with you.There are many gun owners who don't support the right to carry (or only support a narrow type or style of carry according to their own personal preferences).
I say good for them, even idiots should have access to post their opinions on the internet.
They're not necessarily our worst enemy, as they're easily dismissed in conversations such as these.
Do you mean those gun owners who think packing a gun is scary or those simply against oc a rifle? The former are hypocrites, however, I'd say the latter are far from idiots because they disagree with you.
Oh I see now, I hadn't read all the posts so now I understand. I concur with the idiots thing, just didn't understand at first.Well, that particular response was a bit of play on post #104, however, my support for idiots still stands - they should still have access to public discussions.