No.So having only a indiana ltch you cant drive past a school with a firearm in ohio?
And some poor sap is going to pay dearly for it.
No.So having only a indiana ltch you cant drive past a school with a firearm in ohio?
I rest my case. If you're an out of towner, #1 how do you know about this law, and #2 how do you know where schools are?So having only a indiana ltch you cant drive past a school with a firearm in ohio?
Even if it is legal it will take years before ALL of the cops in Ohio get with that program. Ohio cops are, for the most, a gang of jack booted thugs. A lot of them would just as soon shoot you and fill out the paperwork and go home. They have held the view that anyone with a gun and no badge is a bad guy for many years.
(2)(A) It shall be unlawful for any individual knowingly to possess a firearm that has moved in or that otherwise affects interstate or foreign commerce at a place that the individual knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, is a school zone.
1) This a federal law. Hows does being from out of town matter?
2) If you don't know that you have entered a school zone then you haven't violated the law.
What the hell does that mean???
We have some OH cops in my unit, they didn't even know IN residents couldn't carry there.
All or part of your firearm, including raw materials, has at some time been sold across state or national borders. Example: You purchase a gun from your LGS. They in turn had purchased it from a distributor. They purchased it from the manufacturer. They bought the raw materials and parts from their vendors. Each of those entities is located in a different state. Each one of those transactions affects interstate commerce.
In laymens terms please: that has moved in or that otherwise affects interstate or foreign commerce
How does my privately owned firearm fall under that clause?
But that commerce ceases once the transaction is complete. If I purchase a firearm in-state, from an in-state FFL, I have not engaged in interstate commerce.
Congress will argue that school zone gun violence has an effect on interstate commerce via disruption of the educational process even after the gun ceases to be the object of commerce.
The legislative branch wanted to impose a restriction, so they passed a law and the executive branch signed it into being.
They were told by the judicial branch that they didn't have the constitutional authority to do that, so it got axed.
The legislative branch fabricated an extremely weak justification for the authority to again enact the same restriction it had originally tried.
Again, it was signed into law by the executive.
It still stands as current law and as one of the best (that is to say, most egregious and logically absurd) examples of abusing and contorting the spirit of the commerce clause in an attempt to justify a federal authority to intrude upon matters otherwise reserved to the states or the people.
Congress will argue that school zone gun violence has an effect on interstate commerce via disruption of the educational process even after the gun ceases to be the object of commerce.
I don't really care the political history of the statement. What does it mean?
Isn't there something in Ohio State law about 'Must inform' during a traffic stop? Sorry if this is incorrect, trying to recall.
Nevermind (I think) looks like that does not apply to reciprocity:?
http://www.handgunlaw.us/states/ohio.pdf
Yes, we must inform here. I would think that applies to everyone who carries here.
Say it with me..... "I don't know"That's the point, it means nothing apart from the legislative necessity of its inclusion to widen the authority of congress to enact its prohibition.
It serves no other purpose or function and has no impact upon the actual sentence.
It does not serve in any manner to limit the scope, style or type of firearm prohibited.
You could omit that clause completely and the remaining sentence would mean exactly the same thing for all practical purposes.
If you can't tell, I despise it.