Silencers in Greenwood area

[Meister]

Wonder if a call to the mayor's office would rectify that...

-J-

No. Heck the new chief is outspending the old one 3 to 1 and not a word has been said. It's a free for all.

 

[dleach1988]

Thanks for the information gentleman. I appreciate it. It seems I have options if the CLEO doesn't want to sign off, so that's great. Happy Holidays everyone!

 

[mms]

As of 2 weeks ago, he was not signing. I can confirm tomorrow if you'd like.

well that sucks does any one know why?

and yes confirmation would be great. i have been rolling the trust idea around this migh just push me over the edge but i dont think i would transfer my current 3 to it. only for new items

 

[MontereyC6]

Been thinking about that myself... Perhaps contact a few other interested parties...

Let's get through Christmas and we'll talk about the pros and cons.

 

[Fargo]

As of 2 weeks ago, he was not signing. I can confirm tomorrow if you'd like.

Since he is losing the job in, oh lets say 8 days, I wouldn't be too concerned about him. I don't know what John Laut, the new Chief's position will be but it can't be much worse than what the current one's apparently is.

I would wait until after the 1st of the year and then in a very respectful fashion ask Chief Laut his position. He may not have even considered it yet and how the first person that asks comports themself could have a big impact on all of us.

Best,

Joe

 

[Meister]

well that sucks does any one know why?

and yes confirmation would be great. i have been rolling the trust idea around this migh just push me over the edge but i dont think i would transfer my current 3 to it. only for new items

I confirmed, still not. I believe it's a case of him being fundamentally against anything fun.

Since he is losing the job in, oh lets say 8 days, I wouldn't be too concerned about him. I don't know what John Laut, the new Chief's position will be but it can't be much worse than what the current one's apparently is.

I would wait until after the 1st of the year and then in a very respectful fashion ask Chief Laut his position. He may not have even considered it yet and how the first person that asks comports themself could have a big impact on all of us.

Best,

Joe

I'm asking around, I'll report back after Christmas. I believe this chief will be more user friendly.

 

[Indy_Guy_77]

I'm asking around, I'll report back after Christmas. I believe this chief will be more user friendly.

There are lots of us Greenwoodians who'd appreciate the update!

 

[tonhe]

Curious to a comment that was made.. Is there something that actually states that the Suppressor should be locked up when you're away from home? Or are you just speaking in best practices?

Just curious.

 

[Car Ramrod]

Curious to a comment that was made.. Is there something that actually states that the Suppressor should be locked up when you're away from home? Or are you just speaking in best practices?

Just curious.

NFA items need to be secured when not in your possession since you are legally the only person who can possess the item.

 

[tonhe]

But, what does "Secured" really mean? In a legal sense... Technically, if they're in my house, I consider them secured.

NFA items need to be secured when not in your possession since you are legally the only person who can possess the item.

 

[Car Ramrod]

But, what does "Secured" really mean? In a legal sense... Technically, if they're in my house, I consider them secured.

It's not what you define as secured, it's what the ATF defines as secured.

If you are the only one who can can gain access to them, they are secured. (locked in a safe only you know the combo to)

If anyone else is able to gain access to them, they are not secured. (locked in a safe your wife knows the combo to)

IANAL, and my examples are based on if you are the sole registerer of the item.

 

[tonhe]

That's why I'm asking. In none of the paperwork I've seen does it say what secured is..

It's not what you define as secured, it's what the ATF defines as secured.

If you are the only one who can can gain access to them, they are secured. (locked in a safe only you know the combo to)

If anyone else is able to gain access to them, they are not secured. (locked in a safe your wife knows the combo to)

IANAL, and my examples are based on if you are the sole registerer of the item.

 

[dleach1988]

But, what does "Secured" really mean? In a legal sense... Technically, if they're in my house, I consider them secured.

yeah dude, i don't think you have to go as far as getting it's own personal lockbox and what not. As long as it is in your house and not out in the open. For example inside your gun case with your gun.

 

[Meister]

yeah dude, i don't think you have to go as far as getting it's own personal lockbox and what not. As long as it is in your house and not out in the open. For example inside your gun case with your gun.

In all reality, you're not going to be in trouble unless someone steals it and you didn't have it secured in a manner they approve. Otherwise, you could leave it on your kitchen counter and they would never know.

 

[Meister]

I confirmed, still not. I believe it's a case of him being fundamentally against anything fun.



I'm asking around, I'll report back after Christmas. I believe this chief will be more user friendly.

There are lots of us Greenwoodians who'd appreciate the update!

New chief will sign!

 

[Indy_Guy_77]

New chief will sign!

Great news!

Thank you for the update.

 

[dboz]

Good to hear, although now I am going to have to spend some more money.
What to get? Something in .308 I believe

 

[mms]

very good news thank you

 

[dleach1988]

Excellent. Thanks for finding out Meister

 

[mms]

well since i just bought 2 new items that require stamps did you call for an appointment or how did it work?

thanks