Timjoebillybob
Grandmaster
- Feb 27, 2009
- 9,567
- 149
Just like with the now infamous "parking lot bill", my right to keep and bear arms should not be curtailed because my company might hate freedom and the Second Amendment, period. There simply is no justification for infringing upon the right that the Constitution states very clearly shall not be infringed. It`s incredible that here, of all places, an explanation for this position would be necessary.
I disagree with the parking lot bill also. So you have no problem infringing on the property owners rights?
I started this thread and I have read the replies with interest.
I own a home which is private property. Am I within my rights to tell a LEO to leave his weapon in his vehicle if he comes here to do a VIN check?
Am I not afforded the same rights as a LEO in regard to carrying a weapon?
Sure can. And the LEO can tell you okay, I won't do the VIN check.
Sorry, but it`s one or the other, not both depending on circumstances. I see it as my duty to uphold the United States Constitution, and keep and bear arms. No business should have the right to cause me to be disarmed in order for me to make essential purchases.
Once again, it is their property. Do you have the right to tell people what they can or cannot do or what they can or cannot possess on your property?
Freedom of speech isn`t about cursing or profanities. It is about the free expression of ideas and thoughts, even opinions. But when, or if, it becomes profane or filthy, then it`s an assault, and must be stopped.
ETA My how progressive of you, you sound just like antifa or BAMN.
Yes, it is about cursing and profanities.
Speech which everyone likes, does not need to be protected.
Freedom of speech protects that which offends.
Otherwise, they just designate that your speech about guns is profane, and poof, you can't talk about guns.
Yep, pretty much.
Last edited: