I don't see anyone on here being anti by a long shot.What I do see are some that realize that a good percentage of those deer hunting with cfr's,or any weapon for that matter do not no ballistics of the weapon they are using or their own shooting abilities.Some will think that because Carlos Hathcock made hits 800+ yards with a .308 that they can do better because they have a .300 mag.The Indian is far more important than the arrow.I would definately recommend a lot more hunter orange next year,especially if you hunt along woodlines or field edges.I would also recommend that the C.O's stock up on decoy deer,as I bet they will get a workout!
Poachers already use rifles. Why would legalizing them make any difference to a poacher?
I bet there are a ton guys sitting around right now saying, "Man, I can't wait until rifles are legal so I can start poaching!" LOL!
I don't see anyone on here being anti by a long shot.What I do see are some that realize that a good percentage of those deer hunting with cfr's,or any weapon for that matter do not no ballistics of the weapon they are using or their own shooting abilities.Some will think that because Carlos Hathcock made hits 800+ yards with a .308 that they can do better because they have a .300 mag.The Indian is far more important than the arrow.I would definately recommend a lot more hunter orange next year,especially if you hunt along woodlines or field edges.I would also recommend that the C.O's stock up on decoy deer,as I bet they will get a workout!
Poachers already use rifles. Why would legalizing them make any difference to a poacher?
I bet there are a ton guys sitting around right now saying, "Man, I can't wait until rifles are legal so I can start poaching!" LOL!
Poachers already use rifles. Why would legalizing them make any difference to a poacher?
I bet there are a ton guys sitting around right now saying, "Man, I can't wait until rifles are legal so I can start poaching!" LOL!