- Jan 12, 2012
- 27,286
- 113
This is beyond words in the ridiculous department. Titanium Frost - I rest my case. I chilled for a few - but I won't sit and listen to what I know to be bs forever.
You people really believe that the "Feds" can make 28 mostly 6 year olds disappear? The law is on the books that says they can. No conspiracy, no secret.And their families are all OK with that? If the assertion the families were not allowed to see the bodies, it is plausible. And EVERYONE is in on the joke? Not necessary. People can believe a lot of things that are plausible that they did not actually see. Is that REALLY what you are suggesting? How many of YOU could pull that off? With a combination of the severely misguided laws on the books, the amount of liberties the feds take with the laws, and the resources they have available, it wouldn't be too damned tough.
And lets take one of them for example... HAS to be a REAL kid. Has to be believable. The kid had to play soccer with other kids, go to church with them, etc. all of that Prior to this , RIGHT? And then that kid is supposed to magically disappear? Her parents (and grandparents) are supposed to be cool with this (or are they ALL actors and in on the joke). This depends entirely on the truthfulness of the assertion that the families were not allowed access to the bodies. If all they saw afterwards was a box lowered into the ground, it could have been full of old gym shoes for all they know. REALLY? And ALL of them had to magically be in the same classroom or two? Is that what you are suggesting? And that times 28 families. Do you REALLY think that faking the whole scenario is POSSIBLE? Oh, and everyone that ever knew those kids and their families has to be duped or full of crap, right? You are making it more difficult that it really needs to be.
Is all of this REALLY what you are saying?
Or is it more believable that deranged 20 year old with severe issues snapped and grabbed irresponsibly stored weapons? You don't know that either. It is entirely possible to either torture a combination out of someone, or better yet, I could open that safe for you in a matter of minutes. Assuming the ever-changing narrative is true regarding this young man, he is criminally unstable, not stupid. And the rest of the "inconsistencies" were the result of chaos surrounding the events? Inconsistencies are one thing. Changing pretty much the whole damned narrative is something different.And that we have a President and many others who believe in gun control and would not let the event go to waste? And some dumb Republicans who would go along in the name of "bipartisanship" (that being political speak for "hand over the Republic"). That we definitely have. The concern at hand is the question of whether they waited for the right 'crisis too good to let go to waste' or they expedited the process by manufacturing one. This isn't the first time that such a crisis has occurred with perfect timing under circumstances that defied reason, and in at least one case, the laws of physics.
I suggest that you spend less time examining your navel and denying the existence of your own arse, and rather, use that energy to defend the rights that are under attack. Right now, this incident is the focal point of attacking our rights.
Yeesh.
OK, I am not saying that I am convinced of this explanation. The problems I have are that, first, the fact that it connects the dots and is as plausible if not more so than the official ever-changing narrative is in itself a major concern. I can understand some incorrect details getting out, but the whole damned narrative changing on a daily, if not hourly basis? This is worse than James Whitcomb Riley's Bear Story! If nothing else, this alternate narrative does connect the dots, unlike the official story. You may also recall the Hitler/Goebbels formula for the Big Lie (as paraphrased while half asleep). 1. Tell a big lie. The people will see through trifling lies but accept one so sweeping that it is the 'too big to fail' falsehood (i.e., no one would make up a lie that audacious). 2. State it with authority (i.e., it was the evil assault rifle because the *drumroll* medical examiner said so, as opposed to some hack politician). 3. Repeat it over and over.
Since you reacted in a most dismissive way toward the proposed narrative in the OP, let me ask you this: Are you prepared to believe in a crisis too good to let go to waste happening in perfect timing with the ne plus ultra trump card (i.e., dead children, which you may also recall was the case with the Oklahoma City bombing) just as Barry Boy is getting settled into his second term in which he can pull out all the stops without having to worry about another election (remember what he said to Medvedev on this subject)? If the official narrative is correct, the Kenyan is luckier than a busload of leprechauns.