Introduction
A good friend and INGO member has a Ruger Scout rifle. Last summer, he dropped it off at "Lovemywoods Foster Home for Wayward Firearms" so I could experiment with some different factory and hand loaded rounds. The goal was to find several cartridges that shot well in this rifle. It was not to be an exhaustive study but it did include 3 powder types with varying weights, 3 different bullet weights, 8 bullet styles, and 5 factory types of ammo. All these variables made testing and analysis rather complicated. A total of 69 targets were shot and 436 rounds sent downrange.
I posted a thread on load development that described my approach to load development when there are fewer variables.
https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...i-do-load-development-rifles.html#post4749173
The Ruger Scout Rifle
Here's INGO moderator Que shooting the Scout Rifle.
The term Scout Rifle was popularized by the late Col. Jeff Cooper (founder of Gunsite Academy). History buffs can find more information here or via Google:
Jeff Cooper?s Scout Rifles
It is a hunting and survival rifle and was not designed as a military arm. It is intended to be a reliable firearm with strong knockdown power that could be used for both near and far game. Cooper defined a Scout rifle as being less than 6.6 pounds and 39 inches long sporting a 30 caliber round or greater. Scout type rifles often employ a low-power long eye relief optic mounted forward of the ejection port.
The specific rifle I was testing was the Ruger Gunsite Scout Rifle in .308 Winchester. It had a green/black laminate stock. The optic was a Hi-Lux LER2732 2-7x32 long eye relief scope. It had extra spacers giving it a 13.75" length-of-pull. The stock trigger broke at 4.25 pounds. It came with one 10-round polymer magazine.
Approach to Testing
This testing would use both factory and reloaded rounds. I reloaded rounds with 150, 168, and 178 grain bullets using Benchmark, Varget, and CFE223 powders. I typically took the published minimum and maximum loads and divided the ranges into 5 segments. I loaded 10 rounds of each recipe so I could shoot two 5-round groups.
Groups would be analyzed using OnTarget software to determine the minute-of-angle (MOA) of each group. I recorded the best 4 round MOA as well as the 5 round MOA. I like to have the 4 round data in case there is an odd single shot.
All data were entered into an Excel spreadsheet so I could analyze the data several ways looking for trends and correlations.
Phase 1 Testing
Phase 1 testing was done at 50 yards along a dam on our property.
I used paper plates for each test. They are very cheap and yet sturdy. Two target stands allowed me to shoot up to 8 tests for each trip back and forth. Pictures were taken of each target to input into the OnTarget software.
Close up of a single plate.
Here is the same plate with the OnTarget results overlayed. This group had a 1.798 MOA.
I'm not going to display all the individual targets. I just wanted to give the reader an idea of how the tests were performed and the data collected.
During the testing, I turned the shooting bench to face across the pond and shot at a full-sized Bobcat Steel IPSC target at 211 yards. Had two rounds hit 0.750 MOA! Now I'm not going to start thumping my chest and proclaiming the Scout rifle to be a three quarter MOA rifle. I know that two rounds "doth not a tack driver make!" But I still liked it.
Phase 1 Results
The data from the first phase of testing are shown below. I sorted them from the best 5 shot group to the worst.
Several criteria were used to select which ammo types to continue testing. Certainly the 5 shot performance was key, but I also looked for groups that had a really good 4 shot group.
A total of 15 ammo types were selected.
Top Half of the Phase 1 Data
Bottom Half of the Phase 1 Data
Phase 2 Testing
After another stint of reloading to prepare the loads I wanted to test further, I set up at 50 yards but was shooting off a concrete porch. Thirty more targets each with a 5-round group were shot and the data gathered.
On a purely subjective measure, there is a glass patio door behind the shooting bench. With the relatively short barrel of the Scout rifle, my wife (who was inside) said that every time I fired a shot, it sounded like "someone hit the glass door with a baseball bat!"
Shooting the Ruger Scout
During the time I was working with the Scout rifle, INGO member Que came by to do some shooting. While we were at the pistol range, I had him shoot the Scout. (All the Appleseeders out there should take note of the sling and relaxed front hand!) The .308 round tore into the bowling pins hanging there.
Shooting the Ruger Scout - YouTube
"Boxtest" of the Scope
The Hi-Lux scope that is on this rifle is a modestly priced scope with a price point around $115. I was curious how well the internal adjustments tracked so I performed a "Box test". Starting at the upper left diamond, I shot a three-shot group. Then I adjusted the scopes turrets to move the point of impact 9" to the right. (9inches x 2MOA/inch at 50 yds x 4 clicks/MOA = 72 clicks.)
I continued to aim at the upper left corner every time.
After shooting the next group, I adjusted the scope 72 clicks down, shot a group, moved the scope 72 clicks left, shot a group, adjust scope 72 clicks up, shot a group.
If the scope has acceptable internal tracking, the groups should hit near the expected points and ultimately return to the original point-of-aim. This scope did just that. It passed the test.
(There is one error on the target in the picture below. The label "9 MOA" is wrong. It's 9 inches, but at 50 yards, it's 18 MOA.)
Overall Results
The Scout rifle is supposed to be a flexible and reliable firearm. This particular rifle lived up to that reputation. It didn't seem to care whether the bullets were 150 grain, or 168, or 178. They all shot reasonably well.
Looking at the data below and discounting the line labeled "Unknown", the overall performance was around 2 to 2.5 MOA for all the rounds tested. In the final group of 12 best rounds, the performance was mostly between 1.5 and 2.0 MOA. Certainly adequate for a hunting/survival weapon. (For example: That 2.0 MOA at 200 yards would mean hitting a deer within a 4" circle.)
The Ruger Scout had no problem shooting many different types of bullets. Another good attribute for a multi-purpose survival/hunting rifle.
For the reloaded rounds tested, Varget performed slightly better. The Benchmark data should be used with caution as there were far fewer rounds loaded with it than the other two powders.
I selected the top four performers in each bullet weight category to create my summary list of good rounds for the Ruger Scout Rifle. What is a bit surprising to me is that there are good shooting loads in three weight classes.
Two factory loads made the list. (Recall that I didn't test many factory brands. Don't read these results as being exhaustive. Far from that.)
During the testing the bolt action proved to be very positive and reliable. There were no mechanical issues with the rifle.
The Ruger Scout isn't a tack driver.
The Ruger Scout isn't a tactical/military rifle.
It is however, a very reliable and very flexible hunting and survival type firearm in a compact yet potent package.