No. Just that most of them don't want to vote for Trump.That just proves most 'independents' are actually just democrats that don't want to admit it.
or they don't identify with a party, and actually look at candidates positions instead of blindly pulling the party lever.That just proves most 'independents' are actually just democrats that don't want to admit it.
No, that's not it.No. Just that most of them don't want to vote for Trump.
If only voters really did that, a lot of research tends to show that independents run democrat, when it comes to politics now there is no true independent.or they don't identify with a party, and actually look at candidates positions instead of blindly pulling the party lever.
we'd be in a much better place if everyone did do that.If only voters really did that, a lot of research tends to show that independents run democrat, when it comes to politics now there is no true independent.
Yes, I remember back in the day in MI actually voting for some democrats that were good on 2A and some other issues but this was before they all kind of went lock step on everything.we'd be in a much better place if everyone did do that.
You are superimposing your feelings into fact. The only fact you can gleam from that poll is the majority do not want to vote for Trump. That does not make them all Democrats at heart.No, that's not it.
No feelings involved, just common sense, sorry it triggered you.You are superimposing your feelings into fact. The only fact you can gleam from that poll is the majority do not want to vote for Trump. That does not make them all Democrats at heart.
If there's someone here that has no business accusing someone else of being triggered, after whining about INGO allowing differing opinions instead of being his own personal sandbox...why are you figuring it "triggered"?
Because someone states something, quotes something, or says something different... doesn't mean that it is 'triggered'
Back in 1970's(?) in Illinois a real whack job, even by democrat standards won the primary. He was eventually taken off the ballot but the #2 candidate for some reason could not be put on the ballot. The "mainstream" democrat candidate formed a new party so he could still run. At the time you could just pull the party lever and vote for all in the party, of course there was no democrat for Governor.or they don't identify with a party, and actually look at candidates positions instead of blindly pulling the party lever.
The closest I could find to what you describe was 1986. The D ticket got a little over 200K votes with just a LT Gov candidate.Back in 1970's(?) in Illinois a real whack job, even by democrat standards won the primary. He was eventually taken off the ballot but the #2 candidate for some reason could not be put on the ballot. The "mainstream" democrat candidate formed a new party so he could still run. At the time you could just pull the party lever and vote for all in the party, of course there was no democrat for Governor.
I cant remember even who won that election but I knew UAW members who drunk all the koolaid the union served up. They went in and pulled the lever and ended up voting for no one for Governor.
This was a long time ago so my memory might not be perfect so something may be a little off. In fact I don't even remember who won. Jim.
Like I said my memory works pretty well for some things but details not so much. Thanks, Jim.The closest I could find to what you describe was 1986. The D ticket got a little over 200K votes with just a LT Gov candidate.
1986 Illinois gubernatorial election - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org