This is a good attitude/outlook to go into it with. The people pushing for this need to be made to realize the gravity of what they are asking for, in this example true and real depreciation. I didn't notice after reading your 0143 post, but the contrast that shows up after reading the second post is interesting; the first one is so often the attitude we take (NOT criticizing you!) in respect to the idea of compromise, how we let them write the rules and we think we have to play in the confines of those rules, the second attitude is one of making them understand what they are asking for and what it should cost them. Or that it's just wrong altogether.Lord have mercy Amboy49 that is beautiful. Now that I'm less surly than I was on my previous post I see your concerns. This is an investment and puts things in a very different light. If you had a GT500KR Shelby that was hauled off in a raid, that is an investment that you not have for the foreseeable future. If it comes back with a dent in the quarter-panel and the original grill missing your investment has lost value.
While the 2A aspects of HB 1651 get a lot of attention here at INGO, the 4A and 5A parts are just as vital. Thank you for bringing this up. Now to work on getting this in my crib sheet for Wednesday.
Thanks for your hard work.