The question I have though, is he electable in a general election?
The question I have though, is he electable in a general election?
How will this go over with voters?The question I have though, is he electable in a general election?
How will this go over with voters?
Here is the quote from him. He did ask it as a question but that is a big limb to climb out on…That is disingenuously worded to say something that he didn't say. As is normal with MSM.
Here is the quote from him. He did ask it as a question but that is a big limb to climb out on…
“I think it is legitimate to say how many police, how many federal agents, were on the planes that hit the Twin Towers,” he told The Atlantic in a profile that was published on Monday. “Maybe the answer is zero. It probably is zero for all I know, right? I have no reason to think it was anything other than zero.”
Vivek is a good politician.
Vivek is a good politician.
Vivek is constantly….polishing his message.I did not watch the debate, and have no idea what Ramaswamy's position on climate change actually is. However, simply watching those video clips in that tweet leaves me with this comment:
"The Climate Change Agenda is a Hoax" is not the same thing as "Climate Change is a Hoax." Removing words to change meaning and then claiming there is a conflict in positions is disingenuous.
He's good at what he does. I can see why he was able to amass a fortune.FNC is working hard to tell us he didn’t do well.
You are correct. Here's the segment in the debate where the topic of climate change came up and he did say that "the climate change agenda was a hoax and the anti- carbon agenda will throw a wet blanket on the economy." As an added bonus there was a big dust-up too when Vivek said he was the only one on the stage that wasn't bought and paid for.I did not watch the debate, and have no idea what Ramaswamy's position on climate change actually is. However, simply watching those video clips in that tweet leaves me with this comment:
"The Climate Change Agenda is a Hoax" is not the same thing as "Climate Change is a Hoax." Removing words to change meaning and then claiming there is a conflict in positions is disingenuous.
This one still nags me too. I might not be so concerned if it weren't for Barry Zero.Vivek speaks very well, knows all the buzz words and phrases that people want to hear. One thing that concerns me is that he is an unknown. Sure, Trump was not in politics but Trump was very well known. Vivek just appeared. I know nothing of Vivek; nobody really does.
There’s a difference.
With Trump and DeSantis, we have a governance record. With Vivek, we have rhetoric. I have lots of opinions on things but that doesn't mean I'd know how to get my vision implemented.Vivek speaks very well, knows all the buzz words and phrases that people want to hear. One thing that concerns me is that he is an unknown. Sure, Trump was not in politics but Trump was very well known. Vivek just appeared. I know nothing of Vivek; nobody really does.
There’s a difference.
What did you know about Trump before he ran? He was on a bad TV show. He owned a lot of real estate. His political positions changed with the wind. He lacks morals. His businesses declared bankruptcy four or so times.Vivek speaks very well, knows all the buzz words and phrases that people want to hear. One thing that concerns me is that he is an unknown. Sure, Trump was not in politics but Trump was very well known. Vivek just appeared. I know nothing of Vivek; nobody really does.
There’s a difference.
I know he changed political parties 5 times, and was a darling of liberal democrats before he wasn’t.What did you know about Trump before he ran? He was on a bad TV show. He owned a lot of real estate. His political positions changed with the wind. He lacks morals. His businesses declared bankruptcy four or so times.
Agree. With respect to the previous two inexperienced and unknown Presidents, it is safe to say that the left is, in general, pleased with what Obama did while in office. I also think that the same can be said about the right and Trump. So, while Ramaswamy may be an imperfect candidate, I no longer think that inexperience is by itself a reason to exclude any candidate from consideration.What did you know about Trump before he ran? He was on a bad TV show. He owned a lot of real estate. His political positions changed with the wind. He lacks morals. His businesses declared bankruptcy four or so times.