As I recall, the exception is that they don't have to be read implied consent or offered a breath test while unconscious. As noted above, that code section is generally regarded to be unconstitutional as applied to people not showing impairment.Understood. I was thinking about the fact that the IC that Fargo mentioned states that any unconscious parties in the accident aren't required to submit to a chemical test. So some guy ODs and passes out causing an accident with serious bodily injury and he is the only one not required to give a blood sample. That can't be right.