Yep. Smacks of election interference to me to take out a leading political rival.
You mean the sitting VP who publicly admitted abusing US foreign policy power to keep his son’s company from being investigated?Remember when they tried to impeach Trump for trying to get Zelenski to investigate a potential leading Democrat rival? (Biden)
Oh my.
Is that a jamil approved™ source
Is that a jamil approved™ source
Hey you can't put a trademark on a thump emoji. It belongs to the people. It's the people's thumb.
Interesting. One question though has it been established that Trump ever read such a memo to give him the following impression? This is the first time that I have seen mention of it. Don't believe Trump has ever cited the memo as a defense before.While I believe the President has total control of the documents of his administration this is interesting. But if obummer can do this by EO, doesn’t that mean he already has unfettered authority over documents?
Did Obama Just Get Trump Off the Hook?
pjmedia.com
I found this part to be an interesting argument in that the POTUS has sole control over documents unless he voluntarily relinquishes control and gives them to the federal government. It's his voluntary call to make though without being coerced into doing so under threat of legal action. They can't force him to hand them over.This is how the Constitution lays it out.
“Text, precedent, and executive practice reinforce the historical tradition. The records a President creates or receives while performing the duties of his office are his presidential records. That test does not depend on the content of the records, or whether the records are classified. The test does not change when a President leaves office. If, for example, a former President acquires new records after leaving office, those new records would not enjoy the same constitutional status as his presidential records acquired while in office. But the Presidential records a President takes with him upon vacating the presidency are his, to do with as he pleases. The President can keep them, sell them, destroy them, or donate them, as all Presidents have done.”
Long read.
Would a Hollywood casting department cast the motley cast of characters prosecuting Trump? Or is it too unbelievable to an audience? The crazy, dirty, out of their mind overtly partisan prosecutors, James, Bragg, and Willis are beyond anything Hollywood has dreamt up. But, Soros money out them there, so here we are.The Biden and Democrat election interference agenda is desperate to get a trial and conviction before the Nov. election. It's looking like they might have to pin their hopes on the NY DA Bragg Stormy Daniels case to fulfill their wishes. With all of the other indictment delays the Bragg case out of the four separate criminal indictments is the one most likely to proceed on schedule.
Donald Trump's legal prospects are looking brighter
It's looking increasingly likely that Trump's criminal trials will be delayed until after the presidential election.www.newsweek.com
New York University law professor Stephen Gillers told Newsweek on Thursday that the Florida trial will likely not go ahead before the election and that two of the other cases might be delayed beyond November.
He went on to say that the Stormy Daniels case is the most likely to go ahead on time.
"There is no reason to delay the New York State case, which could still meet its late March trial date if the trial in D.C. is pushed into May or June," he said. "So right now, pending further developments in D.C. and Georgia, it looks like the N.Y. case may go first and close to schedule. But I emphasize that the odds can change tomorrow."
There is no doubt that the four indictments were assembled by a motley cast of avowed Trump hating partisans who are coinciding with a singular goal and that is to get a conviction before the election to help Biden. That includes some Judges, prosecutors and venues that are stacked with a like-minded jury pool which increases the odds of securing at least one criminal conviction.Would a Hollywood casting department cast the motley cast of characters prosecuting Trump? Or is it too unbelievable to an audience? The crazy, dirty, out of their mind overtly partisan prosecutors, James, Bragg, and Willis are beyond anything Hollywood has dreamt up. But, Soros money out them there, so here we are.
Next there are the judges. All of them, with the possible exception of Judge Cannon, are leftist political hacks with so many partisan rulings it is becoming evident how bad the judicial bench has become. A look at the two judges in NY, thin skinned egomaniacs children issuing rulings.
Then there is Smith, nothing but a partisan hack attack dog. He has no qualifications for his position other than a hit man that will stop at nothing. He has done so in previous cases, and they were overturned on appeal.
It would be hilarious if not so grave for the country…
Donald Trump indicted for 2nd time, in classified documents investigation: Sources
Trump has been indicted for a second time, in connection with an investigation of his handling of classified information while out of office, sources confirm to ABC News.abcnews.go.com