No idea who that is.DDRESS, is that you? Are you back?
No idea who that is.DDRESS, is that you? Are you back?
No idea who that is.
Forget it and keep doing what you're doing.
Oddly, Indiana, which was instrumental with the troops sent and sacrifices made in preserving the Union, has a strangely high number of "Lost Causers"....not that I am accusing anyone here of that.
Morgan's stragglers that got separated and stayed?Forget it and keep doing what you're doing.
Oddly, Indiana, which was instrumental with the troops sent and sacrifices made in preserving the Union, has a strangely high number of "Lost Causers"....not that I am accusing anyone here of that.
Morgan's stragglers that got separated and stayed?
View attachment 60067
Heck, even flying a US flag from the back of your truck is tacky and disrespectful. Leave it on the pole.
Interesting theory! Perhaps those that thought of this theory are those that are behind the conspiracies.
Interesting theory! Perhaps those that thought of this theory are those that are behind the conspiracies.
Interesting theory! Perhaps those that thought of this theory are those that are behind the conspiracies.
On a scale from 1 to 10 from no chance to absolurtely, here'e what I think:
Panel #1- Las Vegas - 0 (less than no chance)
Panel #2- Fake News- 5 (some truth, but overstated)
Panel #3- Seth Rich - 2 (highly doubtful and who cares)
Panel #4- Climate Change- 7 (Climate change? Yes, always has been. Attributed to man? Not proven. inducing panic for money? Absolutely)
Panel #5- Obama and Islam- 3 (Agnostic who favors all "oppressed persons" over "Western Civilization", not a Muslim)
Panel #6- Globalists- 9 (C'mon)
Panels #7-9- Conspiracies- 8 on the profit part, 1 on the "your own interests" part.
...and none of these are what could accurately be called a "conspiracy" as the term is normally understood.
On a scale from 1 to 10 from no chance to absolurtely, here'e what I think:
Panel #1- Las Vegas - 0 (less than no chance)
Panel #2- Fake News- 5 (some truth, but overstated)
Panel #3- Seth Rich - 2 (highly doubtful and who cares)
Panel #4- Climate Change- 7 (Climate change? Yes, always has been. Attributed to man? Not proven. inducing panic for money? Absolutely)
Panel #5- Obama and Islam- 3 (Agnostic who favors all "oppressed persons" over "Western Civilization", not a Muslim)
Panel #6- Globalists- 9 (C'mon)
Panels #7-9- Conspiracies- 8 on the profit part, 1 on the "your own interests" part.
...and none of these are what could accurately be called a "conspiracy" as the term is normally understood.
Really? Given the nature of how govt traditionally retained power, I'd put that at a 9.99. Has there ever been a govt, in the history of the world, that has not falsely accused a group to rally it's people (or at least some of them)?
In referring to "against their own interests", I was speaking on whether these things are realy "against your own interest"
Voting against onerous regulation for the sake of climate change- not AGAINST your interest.
Voting against people who want to cede US sovereignty and engage in gun control- not AGAINST your interest
One would argue this is a symptom of tribalism. For example, switch to the opposite opinion of the two examples you listed. Would you call that "against your interests?"
With these two examples, my assessment was not based upon "tribalism".
I fail to see the broad interests of the populace being served by stunting economic growth and disarming...no matter who you are.
On a scale from 1 to 10 from no chance to absolurtely, here'e what I think:
Panel #4- Climate Change- 7 (Climate change? Yes, always has been. Attributed to man? Not proven. inducing panic for money? Absolutely)