PERRY-DANIELS TICKET, ANYONE?

[GREEN607]

Daniels asks conservatives to cut Perry some slack - Local News - Indianapolis, IN - msnbc.com

 

[rambone]

Perry is absolutely unacceptable.

 

[GREEN607]

Perry is absolutely unacceptable.
Gingrich is unacceptable.
Palin is unaccepatble.
Romney is unaccepatable.
Cain is unacceptable.
Bachman is unacceptable.
G W Bush was unacceptable.
Bush I was unacceptable.
Reagan was unacceptable.
Lincoln was unacceptable.
ETC, ETC, ETC........... the 'gospel' according to rambone.[/QUOTE]

There, I fixed it for you.......

 

[RelicHound]

Perry is absolutely unacceptable.
Gingrich is unacceptable.
Palin is unaccepatble.
Romney is unaccepatable.
Cain is unacceptable.
Bachman is unacceptable.
G W Bush was unacceptable.
Bush I was unacceptable.
Reagan was unacceptable.
Lincoln was unacceptable.
ETC, ETC, ETC........... the 'gospel' according to rambone.[/QUOTE]

There, I fixed it for you.......

So Paul is acceptable! sweeet! or...are you just doing like the media and completely ignoring his existence?

 

[Expat]

Sorry Mitch. It isn't Perry's debate performance that gives me pause. Some of his positions and actions in office that raise questions in my mind about how conservative he actually is.

 

[Bapak2ja]

Perry is unacceptable. Too much like McCain and Gore. I will vote for a conservative candidate. If the GOP refuses to select such a candidate, I look for another party. The Constitution Party or the Libertarian Party are viable options.

The Ruling Class must be rejected and replaced. If the GOP won't do it, someone else must.

 

[Stschil]

If Mitch is spewing the party line, he's lost my respect.
Perry is a spineless douche. Between him and Obama, I don't which is worse.

I'd like to see more from Cain as I don't know a whole lot about him. That said, from the current crop, I'm leaning heavily toward the Paul camp. His Foriegn policy needs work but, I do agree we need to Focus more on Our Nation and less on others.

 

[BillyT]

No. Parry scares me more than Obama

 

[shibumiseeker]

Not just no, but hell no.

 

[Bummer]

While I realize your list was meant as a dig at Rambone, it's pretty much right on the money. All of the eligibles you listed are absolutely unacceptable. Daniels is also absolutely unacceptable. They're pretty much all Conservative In Name Only.

If you added up all the people who voted against Obama, he still won by six or eight million votes. The Republicans have to win over a lot of people.

Can Perry win over the Libertarians? Why? How about the Constitution Party voters? Why? Democrats? Why? My answer to those is "No. He represents the reason they already don't vote Republican."

There's only one "Republican" candidate that stands a chance. Ron Paul. He's the only one the Mainstream Media (which includes FAUX) is afraid of, and as a result don't like to mention. His foreign policy is exactly what might win over Democrats. The Libertarians already like him. The Constitutionalists have to respect his pro-Constitution record. His biggest problem is that he can't seem to win over the CINOs in the Republican party.

Perry? Only if you want four more years of Obama.

 

[melensdad]

Is Obama more, or less, acceptable to anyone on that list of candidates?

Seriously I think Obama is driving this nation off a cliff at high speed.
Some of the candidates on that list may do it after the TAP on the brakes.
Some maybe will simply slow down to the speed limit and hold course.
A couple might drive below the speed limit but we're still eventually going over the cliff.

Only Gary Johnson and Ron Paul want to put the car in reverse and change the direction completely. Sad to say, neither will be elected. Heck, Governor Johnson doesn't even make the polls as a blip.

So while I'm a huge fan of New Mexico's former libertarian governor, I'm betting that I won't be voting for him.

For me, its a sad statement to claim, but its going to be anybody but Obama. I'm hoping that "anybody" is not Perry, Romney or Christie when it gets to the general election. But my goal is to defeat Obama. The next guy in, no matter how bad the GOP choice, will not be as bad as him. It may not be a good choice, but it will be a better choice.

 

[Pocketman]

PERRY-DANIELS TICKET, ANYONE?

Mrs. Daniels already said no.

 

[HICKMAN]

I liked Perry early on, until I looked more in to him.

I hope for Cristie, like Ron Paul, but would even vote for Cain over Perry/Romney.

 

[Paco Bedejo]

No. Parry scares me more than Obama

^^ This.

If Perry is nominated, Obama has my vote.

At least with an Obama reelection, we'd have gridlock, since we're almost certain to get a Republican-tilted house/senate.

 

[buford t justice]

Some of may get butt hurt by this statement but I believe this country is too liberal for a super conservative candidate to win no matter what party he is from.

 

[Expat]

IMHO anyone that says any of the GOP candidates is worse than Obama is just not paying attention. I believe a lame duck Obama would be even worse than what we have gotten so far, and that is as bad I have ever seen.

 

[Paco Bedejo]

IMHO anyone that says any of the GOP candidates is worse than Obama is just not paying attention. I believe a lame duck Obama would be even worse than what we have gotten so far, and that is as bad I have ever seen.

You have different goals for our nation than others of us. The idea of Perry with a cheerleader house & senate scares me.

 

[ocsdor]

The only republican I will vote for is Ron Paul. Otherwise, my vote will go to a third party candidate again.

 

[Hoosier8]

Cain/Gingrich 2012

 

[jedi]

Is Obama more, or less, acceptable to anyone on that list of candidates?

Seriously I think Obama is driving this nation off a cliff at high speed.
Some of the candidates on that list may do it after the TAP on the brakes.
Some maybe will simply slow down to the speed limit and hold course.
A couple might drive below the speed limit but we're still eventually going over the cliff.

Only Gary Johnson and Ron Paul want to put the car in reverse and change the direction completely. Sad to say, neither will be elected. Heck, Governor Johnson doesn't even make the polls as a blip.

So while I'm a huge fan of New Mexico's former libertarian governor, I'm betting that I won't be voting for him.

For me, its a sad statement to claim, but its going to be anybody but Obama. I'm hoping that "anybody" is not Perry, Romney or Christie when it gets to the general election. But my goal is to defeat Obama. The next guy in, no matter how bad the GOP choice, will not be as bad as him. It may not be a good choice, but it will be a better choice.

Using this logic & I like it BTW. We all know that the car will contine down the road to where the cliff ends and eventually go over. So is it not better than to just go ahead and rev the engine full speed ahead over the cliff NOW so that we have to deal with the issues and not leave the mess up to our children and grandkids?