Fixed to give insite to a similar historical perspective using the same logic.
Wow man. That was a big stretch is your groin ok?
Fixed to give insite to a similar historical perspective using the same logic.
Ones who are or have been in those units most likely don't want to advertise it to the whole lot on here and would be the last people to bash other units or servicemembers of the military.
But I believe their opinion on who has their six does count more than those that aren't at risk next to them and never will be or have been. Kinda like how cops don't like civilians spewing uneducated **** about how to do their jobs. Since your an Leo maybe you'll finally get that one.
Wow man. That was a big stretch is your groin ok?
See, now you'rer just talking to talk. I don't think anyone that supports my POV is telling the SEALs how to do their job. In fact, I believe that it's been made clear, repeatedly, that how the SEALs currently "do" their job, is the standard that should endure. The only disagreement is that who is allowed to participate, once those very strict standards are met.
And yes, their opinion does count, but other than an un-documented "claim," I have yet to see their opposition to it. And assuming they are as "low key" as you advised, it would be doubtful to see it made public, correct?
Hey, I was a victor and a wiskey niner.
Oh, I bet 95% of the people have any idea what victor designation mean, and fewer will know W9 means.
RLTW!
Whatever guy. No they will make it public, just not in an official capacity just like you didn't wanna advertise which department you work for.
Guys still in those rolls face backlash from a administration that already hates our country and especially the military. I don't blame them for not wanting to stick their junk into Something that resembles moochells mouth.
Your the only one talking to talk.
For NOT being a SEAL, you sure have taken a few liberties with their opinions and knowledge of how they do business. Might I ask why you are so much in the "know," where so many aren't?
I agree. The standards are set, whomever meets them is eligible to be on the team. Simple. There is no standard that says a member must be male. If a female qualifies under the same guidelines as a male, let her in.
If she can do it, she can do. It's very simple, cut and dried. It's an objective measurement.
I stand by my earlier point. This radical egalitarianism is an ultra left wing Utopian strawdog that defies the natural order and ultimately will destroy what is right and proper. Don't succumb to their falsehoods and lies. There is a natural order that makes sense and that works, and has since the beginning of time -- one that has only been challenged by the Godless left in the last few liberal secular decades. Men and women are different. We each have our roles. Both are equally important, but not interchangeable. They are complimentary.
I stand by my earlier point. This radical egalitarianism is an ultra left wing Utopian strawdog that defies the natural order and ultimately will destroy what is right and proper. Don't succumb to their falsehoods and lies. There is a natural order that makes sense and that works, and has since the beginning of time -- one that has only been challenged by the Godless left in the last few liberal secular decades. Men and women are different. We each have our roles. Both are equally important, but not interchangeable. They are complimentary.
Fixed to give insite to a similar historical perspective using the same logic.
So you are saying that putting young men and women into positions where they may be sleeping side by side for days at a time could lead to .... issues? Wow, never thought of that. You really think some guy might try to get in a girl's pants after seeing her half nekkid off and on for a couple of days in the field? Well that just flies in the face of.... well something.
For **** sake. The **** show continuesIn the Army, the Delusion Keeps Rolling Along? | US Defense Watch
Don't want separate standards... then change the test.
After all, there is no difference.