What?! Lol, c’mon fos, I like you and the jab trading relationship we have… but you know they dont care about accuracy so that isnt the reason they are wording them in that way… and you know its accurate, without an “official” annoyncement, that they were gunshots and Trump was a victim of an attempted assassination. .I really think you are beating the wrong drum. Most headlines were calling it loud noises etc because they are still trying to confirm. Pretty hard to tell a story in real time with 100% accuracy.
All of the news sites are self correcting as further info comes in.
That’s what I’m gathering.A guy from The Blaze who is a reporter for them says the shooter was on a roof and killed.
The person in the audience being pulled out was killed.
Now that we know he's okay, I am wondering how long until the next one...against either candidate. I don't think this is a one and done.What?! Lol, c’mon fos, I like you and the jab trading relationship we have… but you know they dont care about accuracy so that isnt the reason they are wording them in that way… and you know its accurate, without an “official” annoyncement, that they were gunshots and Trump was a victim of an attempted assassination. .
1 dead 1 critical, shooter deadAnyone in the crowd injured?
100% Agreed. How do you not reconnoiter the venue and not have someone on any vantage point within shooting distance?OMG! The only person who should have been on that roof was a Secret Service or State Police sniper not some assassin! What a security failure!
We'll see how deep they are involved like they were with the whitmer kidnapping.Just like Stephen Paddock, FBI will be unable to ascertain shooter's motives...
Yup. This will be the new norm…Now that we know he's okay, I am wondering how long until the next one...against either candidate. I don't think this is a one and done.
At least the Secret Service sniper got him.
Breaking on WSJ now. Wsj.comLink?
No one else is watching CNNGuy on CNN, Kip Tom, believes there was a second shooter.