I guess that shoulda been purple.Who's "them"? The actually USSS Agents? or the numerous officers there? You actually believe there are USSS Agents that would "look the other way" if they saw a shooter aiming at their Principle? Or police officers for that matter. That's ludicrous.
My absolute favorite character, maybe of all time, was Hank Kimball. That guy would crack me up before he ever said a word.Mr Haney was a sharp dresser....
Just like the Swiss cheese scenario on how industrial disasters happen.
This time, we can take a line from sniffy Joe Biden, and truthfully say “that’s no joke, Jack”!
Mr Haney was a sharp dresser....
I was at the young horny age where I was wanting them to stand up a little higher.
Especially if "she got legs!"'Cause every girl crazy 'bout a sharp-dressed man
He was IDed fast because he was a white male. Coulter's law.Just like they said he acted alone before they had access to his phone, computer, or anything. And he supposedly had no ID on him and they identified him quick.
I often wondered what the real county agents thought of the characterization.My absolute favorite character, maybe of all time, was Hank Kimball. That guy would crack me up before he ever said a word.
So.... about that water tower defense position? I would love to hear your professional thoughts on that. You are among the ones here that have the real world experience to explain why I'm looking at it wrong(hopefully) and I respect that, would love to hear your opinion.I know there is usually ONE...haha. I know that sounds weird but I've seen a single one on these details. The snipers were USSS Uniform Police Division.
Secret Service DEI policies under scrutiny after Trump assassination attempt - Washington Examiner
Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle is under fire in the wake of the assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump as responses from some of Trump's close detail have highlighted Cheatle's DEI push.washingtonexaminer.com
Well, that is a very interesting point. If you were in charge of security, would you have left it unguarded? Now, I am assuming that you have never worked security for a President, so if you, as a complete novice, see that as a failure in security, why would professional security "experts" ignore it?Ok, so you guys are old... Back to my point, I would really like a more experienced thought on why they did not use the water tower to their advantage. I work about 2 to 3 hundred yards from one and with its view it would be second best to being in a plane or helicopter but no reports of any support up there.
I would like to hear that too. I took a look at that water tower in Google Earth and it looks like somebody on top of that would have great coverage of a very large area. However it doesn't look like it would be easy to get on top and maybe not very comfortable being up there.So.... about that water tower defense position? I would love to hear your professional thoughts on that. You are among the ones here that have the real world experience to explain why I'm looking at it wrong(hopefully) and I respect that, would love to hear your opinion.