FIFY...1/20/20245
FIFY...1/20/20245
INSIDE JOBHow did the agents in the building not here him on the roof?
Maybe I missed that.
Yes that was added as a joke.
The dearth of information - no reported comms, no social media etc, no writings or manifesto - is starting to feel like the first couple of days after the Madalay Bay/Stephen Paddock shooting to meI will follow the actual evidence. By "actual" evidence I mean what is known was the case rather than "it doesn't make sense to me" followed by a theory. Worse yet, picking and choosing what super-early "fog of war" reporting to believe and declaring a cover up if later investigation shows that the media irresponsibly (gasp!) reported something inaccurately. This means I have to hold off before making conclusions, but so be it.
Right now, I see complacency leading to or as the result of incompetence and one messed kid. We'll see where that goes. I don't want to speculate about what will be found, but my mind could be changed.
BTW- the whole "what was the motive" thing seems ridiculous and to an extent it is.
Clearly, he wanted Trump dead. His motive seems to have been hatred for Trump....but why...and maybe not?
1) Policies in general
2) A specific policy
3) Persona
4) Someone he cares about hates Trump
5) He hated someone who likes Trump
6) He was suicidal and wanted fame in death
7) He was mentally ill (likely some component of this in all other possible motives).
7a He believed Trump was some sort of existential threat (where have we heard this before?) and he would be the hero
7b He believed that Trump was involved in a vast conspiracy that only he knew about and could save us all from.
It really goes on and on and there are near infinite possibilities. I think it would be important to find out what it was.
they’d be safe fup there if your house got raided.A few weeks back I had a knock on my door. Guy asked if I knew I had dogs on my roof.
Is it that obscure? I just thought you were talking about LeftyGunnerI’m sure there’s lots of em out there. I know one in particular, that absolutely parrots EVERY dem/leftist loony idea and talking point, throws “right wing nut job” around constantly, and to this day, is proud of the fact that he’s voted straight ticket leftist going back to the 1970s. He probably has at least a dozen firearms, never carries them, mind you, he thinks that’s for the paranoid right wing nut jobs, but he has them.
Indiucky knows who I’m talking about.
Every time I see him, I see the treasury agent in The Accountant
Yes you can change, it goes by the last general election. If you voted in it. If you didn't, how you intend to in the next general. I mistated primary.Distinction without a difference IMHO. But do you agree that if that law were enforced, once you vote for one particular party, you can never change? I find that hard to believe or accept.
Yes, thank you.Did you mean to say "the majority of your votes in the last general election?" A primary vote can only be within one Party.
I believe it's a lvl6 felony. But unlessYes. I doubt it has ever been enforced. I'm not even sure there is an enforcement mechanism.
So much for elections being confidential. Might as well have a big screen tv in voting places showing your name and who you're voting for.Yes you can change, it goes by the last general election. If you voted in it. If you didn't, how you intend to in the next general. I mistated primary.
I was commenting on the comment about the presumed views of the parents. The kid looks like Antifa nerd materialCertainly no kids have ever rebelled against their parents' views.
Right. I was kind of agreeing with you I think.I was commenting on the comment about the presumed views of the parents. The kid looks like Antifa nerd material
Enforcement:Yes. I doubt it has ever been enforced. I'm not even sure there is an enforcement mechanism.
Hung Cao was a fascinating speech. Not sure I had heard of him before.It always comes back to the VC...
Very true.Should be someone else that can co-borate this. Not saying that he's making everything up, but others should have known this about the subject also.
a pollwatcher from either party could challenge that.