NY: Christian v James “Vampire” ban on carry on private property

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Alamo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Oct 4, 2010
    9,435
    113
    Texas
    I tried to find another thread concerning this case, but unable.

    As I understand it, New York bans carry on private property, unless the private property owner explicitly grants permission either by sign or personal contact. “Private property“ would include restaurants, shops, and other private property, where the public would normally be invited.

    Plaintiff Brett Christian and FPC sued in federal court as a violation of 2A and Bruen.

    Judge struck down law and denied State of New York a stay on his decision while they cook up an appeal.

     
    Last edited:

    bgcatty

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    25   0   0
    Sep 9, 2011
    4,006
    113
    Carmel
    I almost can’t believe a judge in NY actually read and applied the meaning of Bruen and Heller to a firearms case in New York! Slapping NY in the face denying a request to stay the decision was excellent!
    We need more decisions like this! :thumbsup:
     

    KellyinAvon

    Blue-ID Mafia Consigliere
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 22, 2012
    26,493
    150
    Avon
    Jump Street is "you have Constitutional rights" not "you have no Constitutional rights unless there is a sign saying you have Constitutional rights."

    OH HELL YES!! :rockwoot:
     
    Top Bottom