PoormansMachinegun
Marksman
In 1994 we allowed the gun grabbing left to decide that a standard capacity magazine was to be only 10rds.
Now in 2017 we are about to allow the gun grabbing left, with the blessing of the NRA to decide how fast we are allow to pull the trigger? The NRA is claiming they knew nothing about bump fire stocks, yet they allow a few manufactures of bump fire stocks to vend at their conventions. I do believe they did a write up in their American Rifleman magazine as well.
The part that scares me the most is the language of Dianne Feinsteins bill titled " Automatic gunfire prevention act" that reads " 180 days after the date of enactment of this subsection, IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO import, sell, manufacture, transfer, or POSSESS, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, a trigger crank, a bump-fire device, or ANY PART, COMBINATION OF PARTS, COMPONENT, device, attachment, or accessory THAT is designed or FUNCTIONS TO ACCELERATE THE RATE OF FIRE OF A SEMI AUTOMATIC RIFLE but not convert the semiautomatic rifle into a machinegun.
Let look at the capitalized language in her bill.
"It shall be unlawful for any person to possess, any part, combination of parts,component that functions to accelerate the rate of fire of a semi automatic rifle." Being that most semi automatic firearms can be manipulated rapidly, or bump fire without the use of any device. How would her bill not re-classify most semi auto firearms as being prohibited? Trigger & disconnector springs in AR15 could be considered as "any part, or combination of parts." Regardless of what you think of these devices, any bill needs to be squashed.
Now in 2017 we are about to allow the gun grabbing left, with the blessing of the NRA to decide how fast we are allow to pull the trigger? The NRA is claiming they knew nothing about bump fire stocks, yet they allow a few manufactures of bump fire stocks to vend at their conventions. I do believe they did a write up in their American Rifleman magazine as well.
The part that scares me the most is the language of Dianne Feinsteins bill titled " Automatic gunfire prevention act" that reads " 180 days after the date of enactment of this subsection, IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO import, sell, manufacture, transfer, or POSSESS, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, a trigger crank, a bump-fire device, or ANY PART, COMBINATION OF PARTS, COMPONENT, device, attachment, or accessory THAT is designed or FUNCTIONS TO ACCELERATE THE RATE OF FIRE OF A SEMI AUTOMATIC RIFLE but not convert the semiautomatic rifle into a machinegun.
Let look at the capitalized language in her bill.
"It shall be unlawful for any person to possess, any part, combination of parts,component that functions to accelerate the rate of fire of a semi automatic rifle." Being that most semi automatic firearms can be manipulated rapidly, or bump fire without the use of any device. How would her bill not re-classify most semi auto firearms as being prohibited? Trigger & disconnector springs in AR15 could be considered as "any part, or combination of parts." Regardless of what you think of these devices, any bill needs to be squashed.