Other than entrenching may-issue laws in the handful of states that still have them I don't see much bad coming from an adverse ruling. That may be part of the reason the court narrowed the question presentedLots of excitement about this but am I the only one seeing this going very badly?
Not to mention this won’t be taken up until the fall and that’s more than enough time for them to pack the bench.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Also, beyond the elimination of said may-issue laws there isn't much change that will come from a good ruling either (and the may-issue laws will just be replaced with high fees and excessing training requirements anyway)
There's a reason the purple states that pass gun control (CO, VA) haven't made it a point to do anything with shall-issue carry, its not a hill they want to die on