New Hampshire Primary…

[Ingomike]

Here we go…

“A Boston Globe/Suffolk University/NBC 10 poll of likely New Hampshire voters in that state’s January 23 Republican presidential primary released Wednesday shows President Trump with a commanding lead over nearest rival former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley, 50 to 34 percent, while Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has cratered to 5 percent support–below the number of undecided voters.”

Trump Tops New Hampshire Poll With 50 Percent Support, Haley Trails With 34, DeSantis Below 'Undecided' at 5 Percent | The Gateway Pundit | by Kristinn Taylor

A Boston Globe/Suffolk University/NBC 10 poll of likely New Hampshire voters in that state’s January 23 Republican presidential primary released Wednesday shows President Trump with a commanding lead over nearest rival former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley, 50 to 34 percent, while Florida...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[Shadow01]

Funny how all the polls were wrong when trump won and polls couldn’t be trusted, but now we fall right back in to trusting them again. Never trust polls. The outcome is rigged by the wording of the question. I would go as far as the answers are predetermined.

 

[KG1]

Sen. Ted Cruz 'enthusiastically' endorses Donald Trump for president: 'This race is over'

 

[Ingomike]

Funny how all the polls were wrong when trump won and polls couldn’t be trusted, but now we fall right back in to trusting them again. Never trust polls. The outcome is rigged by the wording of the question. I would go as far as the answers are predetermined.

I put little faith in polls myself. Primary polls tend to be closer than general election polls. However, consistent polls can show trend lines, then one must look at what they have read and observed to see if the boots on the ground match the results of polls.

I saw a Trump/Haley poll at 40% each in NH, but it seems an outlier, but I can see the trend.

 

[Ingomike]

Trump triumphs New Hampshire polls and beyond following Iowa victory

Trump is ahead in the polls in New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina.

justthenews.com

 

[KG1]

The race is over.

 

[HoosierLife]

The race was over before it started.

 

[Ingomike]

The race was over before it started.

NO, DeSantis will save us…

 

[Ingomike]

It's Over: Trump Wins New Hampshire Primary

townhall.com

 

[Ingomike]

Exit Polling Shows That Majority of Nikki Haley Voters Are Not Registered Republicans

townhall.com

 

[HKFaninCarmel]

Funny how all the polls were wrong when trump won and polls couldn’t be trusted, but now we fall right back in to trusting them again. Never trust polls. The outcome is rigged by the wording of the question. I would go as far as the answers are predetermined.

Last minute polls were pretty close in both states. People have figured out how to poll better with Trump. Don’t lock yourself in a bubble.

From the polling- this highlights the problem with Trump. He’s winning older Republicans and rural Repuicans big. He’s still drowning in the burbs, with young voters, and with independents. You don’t win without this group.

 

[jwamplerusa]

Last minute polls were pretty close in both states. People have figured out how to poll better with Trump. Don’t lock yourself in a bubble.

From the polling- this highlights the problem with Trump. He’s winning older Republicans and rural Repuicans big. He’s still drowning in the burbs, with young voters, and with independents. You don’t win without this group.

View attachment 327923

This is what scares me! A rerun of 2020 is going to result in the same outcome without a massive change to voting integrity. That however assumes that there was in fact that much vote trafficking and harvesting in 2020 to flip the election. I know I have changed my position that it probably did, but that doesn't make it fact.

I really do not want to bet the continued existence of the United States of America as a constitutional republic on either voting integrity or the ability the states to stop ballot harvesting and trafficking.

What was needed was a candidate who was more unifying than polarizing. For constitutionalists that was probably Ramaswamy but he gained no substantive traction. In the end we will get what we voted for. That may be the end of the Republic.

 

[Bugzilla]

This is what scares me! A rerun of 2020 is going to result in the same outcome without a massive change to voting integrity. That however assumes that there was in fact that much vote trafficking and harvesting in 2020 to flip the election. I know I have changed my position that it probably did, but that doesn't make it fact.

I really do not want to bet the continued existence of the United States of America as a constitutional republic on either voting integrity or the ability the states to stop ballot harvesting and trafficking.

What was needed was a candidate who was more unifying than polarizing. For constitutionalists that was probably Ramaswamy but he gained no substantive traction. In the end we will get what we the majority voted for. That may be the end of the Republic.

FIFY

 

[HKFaninCarmel]

His numbers only get worse with a conviction.

 

[KG1]

It was always going to be Trump's nomination to lose. He's not going to lose.

Like it or not get used to it.

 

[Shadow01]

His numbers only get worse with a conviction.

I bet they go up. Every charge caused his numbers to rise. I see a conviction no differently.

 

[Ingomike]

Last minute polls were pretty close in both states. People have figured out how to poll better with Trump. Don’t lock yourself in a bubble.

From the polling- this highlights the problem with Trump. He’s winning older Republicans and rural Repuicans big. He’s still drowning in the burbs, with young voters, and with independents. You don’t win without this group.

View attachment 327923

Polling and elections seem to work similarly. If a poll shows good news for Trump it is because it was so much in his favor they couldn’t spin it any other way. If Trump wins an election it will be because his results were beyond what they could cheat at that time…

 

[drillsgt]

This is what scares me! A rerun of 2020 is going to result in the same outcome without a massive change to voting integrity. That however assumes that there was in fact that much vote trafficking and harvesting in 2020 to flip the election. I know I have changed my position that it probably did, but that doesn't make it fact.

I really do not want to bet the continued existence of the United States of America as a constitutional republic on either voting integrity or the ability the states to stop ballot harvesting and trafficking.

What was needed was a candidate who was more unifying than polarizing. For constitutionalists that was probably Ramaswamy but he gained no substantive traction. In the end we will get what we voted for. That may be the end of the Republic.

I think at this point there's no such thing as a 'unifying' candidate, I don't want to run a RINO just to appease the weak independents.

 

[BugI02]

I really do not want to bet the continued existence of the United States of America as a constitutional republic on either voting integrity or the ability the states to stop ballot harvesting and trafficking.

Might I recommend prayer

 

[BugI02]

What was needed was a candidate who was more unifying than polarizing.

Didn't Biden claim he would be the great uniter? How is that working out

The time for compromise has been over since at least 2012

On your feet or on your knees